Podcasts

Episode 96: PD Medications and Side Effects

Adverse effects, often called side effects, are a common phenomenon that accompanies the use of many drugs, including ones used to treat the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Any treatment is a balance between the desired effects of a drug and undesirable ones, so how to best ease symptoms while making the treatment tolerable. Specific to classes of drugs used for PD, some of the side effects may be drowsiness, insomnia, light headedness, hallucinations, cognitive impairment, swelling of the legs, dry mouth, weight gain, compulsive behavior, and others. These are just possibilities, and a good working relationship with a PD health care team can help avoid many of them. Beyond the PD team, keeping other health care providers informed is advisable since drug interactions can occur, so all practitioners (including dentists) should be aware of all medications that a person is taking, prescription, over-the-counter and even supplements.

In this podcast episode, neurologist Dr. Irene Richard of the University of Rochester Medical Center discusses several of the various drugs and drug classes used to treat the symptoms of PD in relation to the adverse effects that can accompany them. She offers insights into several ways to avoid or minimize adverse effects of drug therapy, what clinicians should tell people starting a new drug, and what people should ask as well as be aware of and report back.

Released: December 29, 2020

Podcasts

Episode 134: Meet the Researcher: Disparities in PD Care

As with many medical conditions, people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) may experience disparities in access to care, in diagnosis, treatments, and ancillary care. These disparities may be based on age, gender, race, financial situation, language barriers, and geographic location, among other factors. Dr. Lynda Nwabuobi, now a movement disorders specialist at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Institute in New York City, received her specialized training at Columbia University, supported by a Parkinson’s Foundation Movement Disorders Fellowship.

During her training, she noticed that women with PD who were home bound were more likely than men to be alone and to have less access to a neurologist. She also recognized disparities in the care between the majority white population of people with PD seen at the main hospital clinic of New York University (NYU) compared to the more racially diverse, multicultural community of people seen at NYU’s public Bellevue Hospital nearby – even though they were being treated by the same doctor. In this podcast episode, she describes how she acted on her passion of “creating access to better care to marginalized communities and bring more diversity to the clinic.” Rather than waiting for the community to come to the health care setting, she reached out to them on their turf — at a farmers’ market.

Released: August 9, 2022

My PD Story

Nora Bengoa-Vergniory
Researchers

Nora Bengoa-Vergniory, PhD

2026 Impact Award

Trying to Slow Parkinson’s by Targeting a New Type of Cell in the Brain

In Parkinson’s disease (PD), dopamine neurons in the brain break down over time, leading to progressively worsening symptoms. Most of these neurons affected by PD are found in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) region of the brain. However, neurons are not the only type of brain cell in this region, leading researchers to wonder if other types of brain cells may play a role in PD progression.

Nora Bengoa-Vergniory, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Impact Award, will investigate if oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) could be an important go-between of PD progression in the brain. Previous research in her lab has shown that these OPCs become impaired by alpha-synuclein tangles, much like the surrounding dopamine neurons. Data suggest that OPCs could be functioning like a bridge for PD, helping to spread the tangles from one neuron to the next. If so, targeting them in new therapies could help slow PD progression.

Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory, from her lab at the Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience in Biscay, Spain, will test if a type of drug called PDGFRα inhibitors, which targets and shuts down cells like OPCs, can reduce the spread of alpha-synuclein tangles. By using OPCs and lab-grown neurons, she can quickly and efficiently observe how such treatment could be effective in the human brain.

“By defining the role of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) in Parkinson's and evaluating PDGFRα as a potential therapeutic target, this research has the potential to reveal new avenues for intervention.” – Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory

After finding which PDGFRα inhibitor is most effective at blocking OPCs, Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory will then see if such a treatment is able to reduce the spread of alpha-synuclein in mouse brains. This experiment will be performed alongside similar mice tests to confirm if OPCs play a causal role in alpha-synuclein spread from neuron to neuron.

Nora seated at a computer workstation in a research lab.

Through this work, Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory will uncover how an understudied group of cells contribute to disease progression, with the hope of advancing PDGFRα as a druggable treatment target for PD.

“Despite Parkinson's being first described over two centuries ago, the contribution of OPCs has remained largely unexplored,” said Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory. “This funding will be crucial to enable my laboratory to address this critical gap in knowledge, contributing to the development of disease-modifying therapies that slow or halt disease progression.”

Meet more Parkinson’s researchers! Explore our My PD Stories featuring PD researchers.

My PD Story

Zachary Freyberg headshot
Researchers

Zachary Freyberg, MD, PhD

2026 Environmental Trigger Award

Using Toxin Exposures to Find Genes that Protect Neurons from Parkinson’s

In Parkinson’s disease (PD), dopamine neurons in the brain break down over time. This leads to the progressive and worsening symptoms seen in people with PD. However, scientists have observed that some dopamine neurons in the brain are naturally more resilient than others, staying functional while other similar neurons fall apart.

Zachary Freyberg, MD, PhD, a recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Environmental Trigger Award, is looking for the genetic reasons why some neurons are more resistant to PD than others. In doing so, he hopes to discover new ways to spread such resilience throughout the brain and protect against the disease.

From his research lab at the University of Pittsburgh, Dr. Freyberg is tackling this question from a highly relevant angle: by observing which dopamine neurons survive following exposure to PD-related toxins. His team has already found two genes in animal models that seem to be associated with neuron resilience: NDUFB1 and ULK1. These genes were more active in neurons that stayed healthy when exposed to pesticides linked to PD. When Dr. Freyberg and his research team turned off those genes, the neurons became vulnerable again, signaling their protective importance.

“By identifying and testing the genes and cellular structures that protect human dopamine neurons, this work may uncover new therapeutic targets and biomarkers for neuroprotection.” – Dr. Freyberg

Now, Dr. Freyberg will determine if NDUFB1 and ULK1 are also important for neuron protection against PD in humans. First, he will grow human dopamine neuron cells in a lab, modifying some samples to overexpress these two genes. After exposing these neurons to PD-related toxins, Dr. Freyberg will observe whether the neurons with more active NDUFB1 and ULK1 resist degeneration better than the unchanged neurons. 

Zachary sitting beside a microscope in a research lab.

He will also use a technology called cryo-electron tomography to perform microscopic CT scans of the neurons. This will let his team visualize how the biological machinery in the cells like mitochondria are affected by toxins with and without the protection of NDUFB1 and ULK1.

Lastly, Dr. Freyberg will analyze donated brain tissue from people with and without PD to see how NDUFB1 and ULK1 levels associate with healthy and disease-affected neurons. He hypothesizes that they will see higher levels of activity from those genes in the remaining dopamine neurons of PD-affected brains.

If Dr. Freyberg and his team find that NDUFB1 and ULK1 help protect dopamine neurons in humans, this research could open the door for new treatments that fight PD progression. 

“To be chosen and supported by the Parkinson's Foundation is deeply meaningful to me,” said Dr. Freyberg. “This award could lay the groundwork for therapies designed to slow, or even halt, the loss of dopamine neurons that drives Parkinson's disease.”

Meet more Parkinson’s researchers! Explore our My PD Stories featuring PD researchers.

Advancing Research

The "Golden Year" in Parkinson’s: Why Early Clinical Trial Participation Matters

🧠 What will you learn in this article?

This article highlights how the first year after a Parkinson’s diagnosis can be a valuable window for clinical trial participation.

  • The “golden year” refers to the first 12 months after a Parkinson’s  diagnosis, when symptoms may be mild and medication may not yet be needed.
  • Before beginning PD medications, researchers can observe a person’s natural baseline and test treatments that may slow or stop PD progression.
  • Greater awareness and early conversations with care team members can help newly diagnosed people join clinical trials sooner.
A female patient talking with her doctor who is holding a tablet.

After a Parkinson’s diagnosis, many people start their journey by learning about treatments to help ensure their best quality of life. But according to experts like Robert Hauser, MD, from the University of South Florida, a Parkinson’s Foundation Center of Excellence, the initial months after a diagnosis also hold a unique window of opportunity that may go unnoticed by people newly diagnosed with Parkinson’s and their care team. 

In Episode 108 of the Parkinson’s Foundation podcast Substantial Matters: Life & Science of Parkinson's, Dr. Hauser discusses the "golden year," a time prior to starting Parkinson’s medications. This window may hold a key to finding therapies that could change the course of PD. 

What is the “Golden Year”?

The "golden year" refers to the period of about 12 months after diagnosis when a person is more likely to have mild movement symptoms and may not yet need Parkinson’s medications to manage activities of daily life. 

Before starting medications to manage Parkinson’s symptoms, the brain is at its natural baseline. People who have not started medications are sometimes called treatment naïve. Being treatment naïve gives researchers a window to test disease-modifying therapies — treatments designed to slow, halt or possibly reverse Parkinson's progression. 

Timing Matters

Current Parkinson's medications manage movement symptoms such as stiffness and slowness of movement. However, they do not treat symptoms that may appear after many years, such as cognitive changes or serious balance issues. An important need in Parkinson's research is finding a way to diagnose the disease as early as possible and halt its progression before these long-term symptoms arise. 

For a clinical trial to test how a new treatment works, researchers must track changes in a person’s PD over time. Entering a trial before daily medication becomes necessary gives researchers the clearest picture of how well the new treatment works. This makes the "golden year" a unique opportunity for both researchers and people with PD.

Despite the importance of trials in the first year after a Parkinson’s diagnosis, finding eligible participants is a hurdle. It remains a challenge because of these factors: 

  • Starting medication: Neurologists often start people with PD on medications right away, making treatment-free baseline observations unavailable.
  • Wait times: Delays in scheduling appointments with movement disorder specialists can cause newly diagnosed people to miss early trial eligibility. 
  • Awareness: Many health care professionals are unaware of clinical trials for newly diagnosed and treatment naïve people — or how important the golden year is to Parkinson’s research — and do not share trial information with people with PD.

What can we do?

To make the most of this critical time, collaboration is needed between people with Parkinson’s and their care teams:

  • People with Parkinson’s and families: If you or a loved one is newly diagnosed and do not feel an immediate need for medication to manage daily activities, ask your PD doctor about clinical trial opportunities for treatment-naïve individuals.
  • Healthcare providers: Doctors and care teams should discuss clinical trials with their newly diagnosed patients before prescribing PD medications. If symptoms are mild and manageable, allowing time to consider a trial can open doors to groundbreaking research. 
  • Improving access: Some medical centers are working to improve systems to get newly diagnosed people into appointments quickly, so they can explore trial options before starting standard treatment. 

What’s Next

Every approved Parkinson’s treatment exists today because people chose to voluntarily participate in clinical research in the past. Raising awareness about research options helps to ensure newly diagnosed people know what's available and to decide if research participation is the right choice for them. 

Whether you are newly diagnosed or familiar with Parkinson’s, explore opportunities to get involved with PD research today. Explore current studies now.

My PD Story

Edwin Castillo headshot
People with PD

Edwin Castillo

How Genetic Testing Gave Me Confidence to Move Forward with Deep Brain Stimulation

When you live with Parkinson's disease (PD), every treatment decision feels significant. You weigh the benefits, risks and uncertainty of what the future may hold. For me, one of the biggest decisions was whether to pursue Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), specifically targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN).

Like many people considering DBS, I spent countless hours researching. One topic that kept appearing was the relationship between the gene mutation linked to PD called GBA1 and cognitive decline after DBS. What I learned through genetic testing ultimately gave me greater confidence in moving forward with surgery.

What Is the GBA1 Gene?

Certain mutations of the GBA1 gene are the most common genetic risk factor for Parkinson's. Research has shown that people with Parkinson's who carry a GBA1 mutation may experience a faster progression of cognitive symptoms and may have a higher risk of developing dementia over time. 

In recent years, researchers have also explored how GBA1 mutations might influence outcomes after DBS. Studies have found that while people with GBA-associated Parkinson's generally experience excellent motor improvement from DBS, some may face a higher risk of cognitive and neuropsychiatric decline compared with non-carriers. 

The Value of Knowing More

One of the challenges of living with Parkinson's is uncertainty. We often hear statistics and probabilities, but those numbers can feel very impersonal.

Edwin and his wife

Deep Brain Stimulation is a surgical treatment used to help control PD movement symptoms, including tremor, stiffness, slowness of movement and medication fluctuations. For many, DBS can significantly improve quality of life and reduce dependence on medications. However, like any treatment, I had to weigh the potential risks and benefits of DBS. 

When I learned about the possible relationship between GBA1 mutations and cognitive outcomes after DBS, I naturally wondered: Do I have this genetic risk factor?

That question led me to PD GENEration.

How PD GENEration Helped Me

PD GENEration is a Parkinson's Foundation study that offers genetic testing and genetic counseling for people living with Parkinson's. The program helps people understand whether they carry genetic variants associated with Parkinson's. As a participant I underwent genetic testing and learned that I do not carry a GBA1 mutation.

That single piece of information did not eliminate all risks associated with DBS. No medical procedure is risk-free, and every person's Parkinson's journey is unique.

However, knowing that I was not a GBA1 carrier removed a significant concern that had been weighing on my mind. Based on current research, the increased cognitive risk observed in GBA1 mutation carriers was not a factor in my personal situation. 

Rather than making the decision for me, the genetic information helped me make a more informed decision.

Knowledge Replaces Fear

One of the most powerful aspects of genetic testing is that it can replace uncertainty with knowledge. Before receiving my results, I found myself asking:

  • Am I at higher risk for cognitive decline after DBS?
  • Should I reconsider surgery?
  • Am I missing important information that could affect my future?

After receiving my PD GENEration results, I had greater clarity. While I still needed to evaluate all the other factors involved in DBS, I felt more confident discussing treatment options with my neurologist and DBS team.

The information didn't guarantee a particular outcome. But it did provide something equally valuable: peace of mind.

Personalized Medicine in Action

One of the exciting developments in Parkinson's care is the move toward personalized medicine. Instead of treating every patient exactly the same, clinicians can increasingly use genetic, clinical and cognitive information to help guide treatment decisions.

Research suggests that genetic information, including GBA1 status, may help patients and physicians have more informed conversations about DBS, expectations, and long-term planning. 

For me, PD GENEration was an example of personalized medicine at work.

My Advice to Others Living with Parkinson's

If you are considering DBS, learn as much as possible, ask questions and have open conversations with your healthcare team.

Genetic testing may not be necessary for everyone, and it may not change every treatment decision. But for me, understanding my genetic profile helped remove some uncertainty from a major life decision.

Today, I view my PD GENEration results as one of the factors that helped me move forward with confidence. I did not learn that I was "risk-free." What I learned was that one important genetic concern, the GBA1 mutation, was not part of my Parkinson's story.

Sometimes knowledge doesn't change the destination. It simply makes the path forward a little clearer.

And when you're facing a decision as significant as DBS, that clarity can make all the difference.

Read Edwin's story in Spanish

Raise Awareness

Mi Historia con EP – Edwin Castillo

Retrato de Edwin Castillo

Cómo las pruebas genéticas me dieron la confianza para seguir adelante con la estimulación cerebral profunda  

Cuando uno vive con la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP), cada decisión durante el tratamiento se siente importante: sopesa los beneficios, los riesgos y la incertidumbre de lo que el futuro pueda traer. Para mí, una de las decisiones más importantes fue si seguir adelante con la estimulación cerebral profunda (ECP o DBS, por sus siglas en inglés), dirigida específicamente al núcleo subtalámico (STN, por sus siglas en inglés).

Como muchas personas que consideran la ECP, pasé incontables horas investigando. Un tema que seguía apareciendo era la relación entre la mutación genética vinculada a la EP llamada GBA1 y el deterioro cognitivo después de la DBS. Lo que aprendí mediante las pruebas genéticas finalmente me dio más confianza para seguir adelante con la cirugía.

¿Qué es el gen GBA1?

Ciertas mutaciones del gen GBA1 son el factor de riesgo genético más común para el Parkinson. Las investigaciones han mostrado que las personas con Parkinson que portan una mutación de GBA1 pueden experimentar una progresión más rápida de los síntomas cognitivos y pueden tener un mayor riesgo de desarrollar demencia con el tiempo.

En los últimos años, los investigadores también han explorado cómo las mutaciones de GBA1 podrían influir en los resultados después de la ECP. Los estudios han encontrado que, aunque las personas con Parkinson asociado con GBA1 por lo general experimentan una excelente mejoría motora con la ECP, algunas pueden enfrentar un mayor riesgo de deterioro cognitivo y neuropsiquiátrico en comparación con las personas no portadoras.

El valor de saber más

Uno de los desafíos de vivir con el Parkinson es la incertidumbre. A menudo escuchamos estadísticas y probabilidades, pero esos números pueden sentirse muy impersonales.

Edwin y su esposa

La estimulación cerebral profunda es un tratamiento quirúrgico que se usa para ayudar a controlar los síntomas motores de la EP, incluidos el temblor, la rigidez, la lentitud de movimiento y las fluctuaciones de los medicamentos. Para muchas personas, la DBS puede mejorar significativamente la calidad de vida y reducir la dependencia de los medicamentos. Sin embargo, como con cualquier tratamiento, tuve que sopesar los posibles riesgos y beneficios de la ECP.

Cuando supe de la posible relación entre las mutaciones de GBA1 y los resultados cognitivos después de DBS, naturalmente me pregunté: ¿Tengo este factor de riesgo genético?

Esa pregunta me llevó a PD GENEration.

Cómo PD GENEration me ayudó

PD GENEration es un estudio de la Parkinson's Foundation que ofrece pruebas genéticas y consejería genética para las personas que viven con el Parkinson. El programa ayuda a las personas a entender si portan variantes genéticas asociadas con el Parkinson. Como participante, me sometí a pruebas genéticas y supe que no porto una mutación de GBA1.

Ese solo dato no eliminó todos los riesgos asociados con la ECP. Ningún procedimiento médico está libre de riesgos y la experiencia de cada persona con el Parkinson es única.

Sin embargo, saber que yo no era portador de GBA1 eliminó una preocupación importante que me había estado pesando. Según las investigaciones actuales, el mayor riesgo cognitivo observado en las personas portadoras de una mutación de GBA1 no era un factor en mi situación personal.

En lugar de tomar la decisión por mí, la información genética me ayudó a tomar una decisión más informada.

El conocimiento reemplaza el miedo

Uno de los aspectos más poderosos de las pruebas genéticas es que pueden reemplazar la incertidumbre con conocimiento. Antes de recibir mis resultados, me encontré preguntándome:

  • ¿Tengo un mayor riesgo de deterioro cognitivo después de la ECP?
  • ¿Debería reconsiderar la cirugía?
  • ¿Me falta información importante que podría afectar mi futuro?

Después de recibir mis resultados de PD GENEration, tuve mayor claridad. Aunque todavía necesitaba evaluar todos los demás factores relacionados con la ECP, me sentí con más confianza al hablar sobre las opciones de tratamiento con mi neurólogo y el equipo de la ECP.

La información no garantizaba un resultado en particular. Pero sí brindó algo igual de valioso: tranquilidad.

La medicina personalizada en acción

Uno de los avances emocionantes en la atención del Parkinson es el paso hacia la medicina personalizada. En lugar de tratar a cada persona exactamente de la misma manera, los médicos pueden usar cada vez más información genética, clínica y cognitiva para ayudar a orientar las decisiones de tratamiento.

Las investigaciones sugieren que la información genética, incluido el estado de GBA1, puede ayudar a que las personas y los médicos tengan conversaciones más informadas sobre la ECP, las expectativas y la planificación a largo plazo.

Para mí, PD GENEration fue un ejemplo de la medicina personalizada en acción.

Mi consejo para otras personas que viven con el Parkinson

Si usted está considerando la ECP, aprenda todo lo posible, haga preguntas y tenga conversaciones abiertas con su equipo de atención médica.

Las pruebas genéticas pueden no ser necesarias para todas las personas y puede que no cambien cada decisión de tratamiento. Pero, para mí, entender mi perfil genético ayudó a quitar algo de incertidumbre de una decisión importante de mi vida.

Hoy, veo mis resultados de PD GENEration como uno de los factores que me ayudaron a seguir adelante con confianza. No supe que estaba "libre de riesgo". Lo que sí aprendí fue que una preocupación genética importante, la mutación de GBA1, no formaba parte de mi experiencia con el Parkinson.

A veces, el conocimiento no cambia el destino. Simplemente hace que el camino hacia adelante sea un poco más claro.

Y cuando usted enfrenta una decisión tan importante como la ECP, esa claridad puede marcar toda la diferencia.

Lea la historia de EDWIN en inglés

Raise Awareness

5 maneras en que las políticas afectan su vida con Parkinson

🧠 ¿Qué aprenderá en este artículo?

Este artículo presenta cinco políticas a nivel federal y estatal que influyen directamente en la vida de las personas con la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP). El artículo destaca cómo:

  • Un incremento en los fondos federales y estatales es esencial para acelerar la investigación sobre el Parkinson y el apoyo a avances importantes.
  • Las políticas influyen directamente en el acceso oportuno a atención de alta calidad para el Parkinson y pueden acelerar un diagnóstico de la EP.
  • Las regulaciones de salud ambiental, como prohibir el paraquat, pueden reducir los riesgos relacionados con desarrollar el Parkinson.
Grupo en el Foro de Políticas sobre el Parkinson

Cuando usted vive con la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP), las decisiones que se toman en el Capitolio y en las capitales estatales de todo el país pueden moldear directamente la vida diaria. Ya sea el financiamiento que impulsa investigaciones innovadoras, las políticas que determinan si usted puede acceder a un especialista o las protecciones ambientales que podrían prevenir la EP desde el principio, la política es personal.

La primavera pasada, esa verdad cobró vida de una manera poderosa. En marzo de 2026, más de 300 defensores de todo el país se reunieron en Washington, D.C. para el 2026 Parkinson’s Policy Forum (Foro de Políticas sobre el Parkinson de 2026), un evento que reunió a personas que viven con la EP, aliados en el cuidado, médicos, investigadores y defensores para llevar el mensaje de la comunidad de Parkinson al Congreso.

El Foro fue un recordatorio inspirador de lo que podemos lograr cuando hablamos con una sola voz. Aunque el Foro ya concluyó, el impulso que generó apenas comienza. Las prioridades en las políticas que los defensores promovieron en el Capitolio afectan a todas las personas que viven con el Parkinson; y aún así hay maneras poderosas de hacer oír su voz.

A continuación presentamos cinco áreas clave de políticas sobre el Parkinson en las que su voz puede marcar una diferencia real.

1. Implementación del National Parkinson’s Project (Proyecto Nacional sobre el Parkinson)

El National Parkinson’s Project es un hito histórico: es la primera iniciativa federal dedicada a la enfermedad de Parkinson. El Congreso aprobó una ley para crear el National Parkinson’s Project en 2024, pero eso es solo el comienzo. La implementación requiere presión y dedicación continuas para asegurar que la iniciativa avance sin demora.

La Parkinson's Foundation trabaja para proteger este proyecto histórico y generar impulso mientras el gobierno avanza para ponerlo en marcha. Eso significa colaborar con el Consejo Asesor del National Parkinson’s Project mientras lleva a cabo su labor vital para ayudar a prevenir, diagnosticar, tratar y, en última instancia, curar el Parkinson; así como hacer recomendaciones prácticas para mejorar la calidad de vida de quienes viven con la EP. Este proyecto representa una oportunidad que trascenderá generaciones, y defensores como usted ayudan a mantenerlo en el buen camino.

2. Mayor inversión para la investigación sobre la EP

Estamos más cerca que nunca de desarrollar tratamientos que podrían ralentizar o detener el Parkinson, no solo controlar sus síntomas. Pero ese progreso depende de una inversión sostenida. El apoyo federal para la investigación sobre la EP no ha seguido el ritmo del rápido crecimiento de la enfermedad, y la incertidumbre sobre el financiamiento pone en riesgo avances cruciales.

La Parkinson's Foundation promueve un aumento de las inversiones, incluidos $600 millones al año en investigaciones sobre el Parkinson financiadas por las instituciones de salud a nivel nacional, así como inversiones complementarias a nivel estatal que amplían y fortalecen lo que hace posible el financiamiento federal.

Cada dólar invertido en investigación nos acerca un paso más a una cura —y cada defensor que presenta el caso a un legislador ayuda a asegurar ese financiamiento.

3. Atención oportuna, asequible y de calidad para el Parkinson

El Parkinson es la enfermedad neurodegenerativa de más rápido crecimiento, con 90.000 nuevos diagnósticos cada año. Sin embargo, el acceso a atención de calidad está cada vez más fuera del alcance de muchas personas. La escasez de especialistas en trastornos del movimiento implica largas distancias de viaje. Las brechas de cobertura y los costos impredecibles generan estrés adicional. La calidad de la atención varía ampliamente según el lugar donde usted viva. 

La Parkinson's Foundation apoya políticas que cambian esta realidad al facilitar el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la EP, estabilizar y ampliar la cobertura de telesalud para llegar a las personas dondequiera que estén, y garantizar programas sólidos de salud pública que apoyen tanto la atención como la investigación. La atención médica de calidad de las personas con Parkinson no debería estar determinada por su código postal.

Ya sea que se trate de ampliar el acceso a la telesalud o de fortalecer la cobertura de Medicare, estos cambios en políticas tienen un impacto directo en su capacidad de obtener la atención necesaria para vivir bien con la EP.

4. Abordar las amenazas ambientales para la salud vinculadas al Parkinson

Las causas del Parkinson son complejas, pero la investigación se ha vinculado con riesgos ambientales—incluidos ciertos químicos como el paraquat y el tricloroetileno (TCE, por sus siglas en inglés)— con un mayor riesgo de desarrollar la EP. Aunque en más de 70 países, incluido China, se ha prohibido el paraquat, este pesticida todavía se vende y se usa en los EE. UU..

La Parkinson's Foundation está presionando a la Agencia de Protección Ambiental y a los gobiernos estatales para que pongan fin al uso del paraquat en los EE. UU.. Este cambio de política podría prevenir innumerables casos futuros de la EP, particularmente en comunidades rurales donde la exposición a pesticidas es más común.

El cambio de política puede proteger a las generaciones futuras de recibir alguna vez un diagnóstico de Parkinson. Eso es algo poderoso por lo cual luchar.

5. Educación: acceso a información sobre la EP

El conocimiento es poder, especialmente cuando se trata de un diagnóstico temprano y de vivir bien con el Parkinson. Sin embargo, demasiadas personas con la EP, sus familias e incluso sus proveedores de atención médica carecen de acceso a información oportuna, de alta calidad y personalizada sobre la enfermedad.

La Parkinson's Foundation impulsa cambios en políticas que mejoran la educación sobre la EP para las personas con Parkinson, los cuidadores y los profesionales de la atención de la salud. Profesionales de la salud mejor informados significan diagnósticos más tempranos y mejor atención. Pacientes y familias mejor informados significan una toma de decisiones más segura y empoderada en cada etapa. El acceso a información sobre la EP también apoya la prevención, lo que ayuda a las comunidades a reconocer factores de riesgo y tomar medidas antes de que ocurra un diagnóstico.

Las personas con Parkinson están en el centro de todo lo que hacemos, y garantizar que tengan la información que necesitan es una de las formas más significativas en que las políticas pueden mejorar vidas ahora mismo.

Su voz puede cambiarlo todo

Existe una conexión directa entre las acciones que tomamos hoy y el futuro que queremos ver. Los fondos para investigación asegurados este año pueden convertirse en la nueva opción de tratamiento disponible en cinco años. La política de telesalud aprobada hoy significa que su vecino en un condado rural puede consultar a un especialista el próximo mes. La prohibición del paraquat que se promueve ahora podría significar un diagnóstico menos en su comunidad.

¿Está listo para marcar la diferencia? Visite nuestro Centro de Acción para unirse a nuestra Red de Defensores, comunicarse con sus representantes y actuar sobre los temas que más importan hoy a la comunidad de la EP.

My PD Story

Jessica R. headshot
People with PD

Jessica R.

I’m 36 years old and live in New York City. Twelve years ago, at just 24 years old, I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease (PD). It was completely unexpected, especially since no one in my family has Parkinson’s. At the time, it was hard to imagine what the future would look like. Looking back now, I can honestly say that while Parkinson’s has changed my life, it hasn’t stopped me from living it. In many ways, it has given me a new sense of purpose and a chance to help others.

For many years, I relied on levodopa every two to three hours to manage my symptoms. Finding the right balance was challenging. Some days I experienced dyskinesia, while other days my tremors were more noticeable. I worked closely with my doctors, adjusting doses and trying different approaches, but it often felt like I was chasing the right combination.

In the summer of 2021, while spending more time at home during the pandemic, I realized my symptoms were becoming more difficult to manage. Around that time, I attended a webinar about deep brain stimulation (DBS), and it gave me hope that there might be another option. I talked with my neurologist who felt I was a good candidate. Six weeks later, I had the surgery. After several weeks of programming appointments, we found the settings that worked best for me, and now I only return once a year for adjustments.

For me, DBS was truly life-changing. Since my surgery, I have not needed to take levodopa, and I feel incredibly grateful for the difference it has made in my daily life.

Today, I focus on what I can do. I stay active with Pilates, boxing, and physical therapy. Exercise has become one of the most important tools in managing my Parkinson’s. The Bandeen Center in NYC has also been an invaluable part of my journey, providing specialized fitness programs, education and a supportive community that helps me stay strong and motivated. 

I also make time for the things that bring me joy. I always have a trip planned or something to look forward to, and that excitement keeps me moving forward. Every summer, I travel to Europe. Parkinson’s has never stopped me from exploring the world.

Over the past 12 years, I’ve learned that living well with Parkinson’s is about building the right support system and finding what works for you. I’m fortunate to have an incredible team of doctors, and together we’ve found ways to help me continue living the life I want. If sharing my experiences can make someone else’s journey a little easier, then every conversation is worthwhile.

One of the greatest sources of support has been the Parkinson’s Foundation. My doctor introduced me to the Foundation, and it has become a place where I can find trusted resources, connect with others, share my story, and advocate for people living with Parkinson’s — especially those with young-onset Parkinson’s disease.

One thing I’ve learned is that everyone’s Parkinson’s journey is unique. No two people have the same symptoms, treatment plan or experience, and that’s OK. Try not to compare your path to anyone else’s. Focus on taking one step at a time and finding the approach that helps you be the best version of yourself.

When I was first diagnosed, I was encouraged to keep it private, so I only shared my diagnosis with my closest family and friends. For a while, I let Parkinson’s define me. Over time, though, I realized that Parkinson’s is only one part of who I am — it is not my whole story. With the right support, resources and mindset, it’s possible to continue pursuing your goals, making memories and finding joy.

That’s why I choose to share my story. I hope it reminds others that there is hope after a Parkinson’s diagnosis. Be curious, ask questions, advocate for yourself and don’t be afraid to lean on your support system. 

Every year, advances in research, technology and medicine are creating new possibilities for people living with Parkinson’s. Your life may look different than you expected, but it can still be full, meaningful and joyful. Parkinson’s is part of my story, but it is far from the whole story.

Learn more about young-onset Parkinson’s disease.

Science News

Two New Studies Show Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation May Improve Walking in Parkinson’s

🧠 What will you learn in this article?

This article highlights two studies, published in Nature Medicine, that show promise for using new adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) methods to treat walking difficulties in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Highlights include:

  • Unlike traditional DBS, adaptive DBS adjusts stimulation in real time based on movement or brain signals. 
  • Both studies identified personalized brain signals (neural biomarkers) to tailor stimulation for specific movement. Both approaches improved walking while preserving traditional DBS benefits for symptoms such as tremors and stiffness.
  • Researchers at Lausanne University Hospital in Switzerland used brain signals to identify and tailor stimulation for different activities. 
  • Researchers the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) used different brain signals to time and adjust stimulation to participant’s walking rhythm.
Parkinson's Foundation Science News blogs

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most common surgical treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD). It uses continuous electrical pulses to help control movement symptoms like tremor, stiffness and slowness. For many, DBS can be life changing. Its big shortfall is that it delivers the same stimulation all the time, which does not help with walking difficulties — including unsteady gait, freezing of gait (a sudden inability to move when walking) and falls. These are among the most disabling and dangerous PD symptoms with limited treatment options.

Recently, major advancements have been made in adaptive DBS (aDBS), which is when a DBS device adjusts its stimulation in real time based on a person’s symptoms or behavior. Studies show that aDBS is more helpful for controlling typical “on/off” symptoms (such as tremor and rigidity) compared to traditional DBS treatment. Now, two new studies published in Nature Medicine suggest that aDBS may also hold promise for treating gait impairment in people with Parkinson’s. 

  1. One study, conducted by a team at Lausanne University Hospital in Switzerland, developed a system that uses brain signals to detect which locomotor (the ability to move) activity a person is performing — such as sitting, standing, walking or turning — and selects stimulation settings optimized for that specific activity.
  2. The other study, led by a team at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), took a different approach: timing stimulation to specific phases of the walking cycle, footstep by footstep, guided by brain signals unique to each individual participant.

Both studies were small and early-stage but highlight that adaptive DBS could improve walking in ways that traditional DBS cannot. 

Study Results

The primary focus of both studies was whether adaptive DBS settings that target gait are feasible and safe, and whether they could improve walking compared to traditional continuous stimulation. Encouragingly, neither study reported negative events. 

Adaptive DBS was well tolerated in all participants, and both studies found that it still helped manage the movement symptoms — like tremors and stiffness — that traditional DBS provides. Beyond safety, both teams also tracked changes in participants’ walking patterns, including step consistency, symmetry and falls.

2 new adaptive DBS studies graphic

The Swiss study enrolled six people with Parkinson’s who had DBS implants in the subthalamic nucleus. The team used recordings from the implanted DBS device, combined with detailed motion tracking, to develop algorithms that could detect which activity a person was performing — walking on flat ground, avoiding obstacles, turning, etc. — and automatically adjust stimulation settings to match.

  • This approach improved movement across multiple daily activities while preserving the benefits of traditional DBS for other movement symptoms.
  • This system successfully decoded and adjusted to locomotor activities in real time, even as participants’ symptoms changed or took levodopa medication throughout the day — a key challenge for adaptive approaches.

The UCSF study enrolled five people with Parkinson’s who received DBS implants in the globus pallidus region, along with additional recording devices in other brain regions. Using those recordings, they found that the brain produces distinct electrical patterns during specific phases of walking — for example, when the leg swings forward. 

These patterns were unique to each participant, appearing at different frequencies and brain locations. By identifying each person’s individual ‘gait signature,’ the researchers were able to program the neurostimulator to deliver brief boosts of stimulation timed to match each step.

  • During in-clinic testing, this adaptive DBS strategy improved step variability and step symmetry compared to traditional DBS stimulation.
  • Three participants completed a multi-day trial in their own homes, where neither the participants nor the researchers knew which type of stimulation was being used. In this real-world setting, adaptive DBS maintained general movement symptom control and reduced falls.

The UCSF study in this article was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), part of the National Institutes of Health. The Parkinson’s Foundation advocates for increased federal funding to advance PD research, improve treatments and move us closer to a cure.

While these are early results need to be confirmed in larger studies, they offer a promising glimpse into a fundamentally new way to address one of the most challenging aspects of Parkinson’s: walking difficulties.

Highlights

  • Two studies, both published in Nature Medicine, tested adaptive DBS systems designed to target movement symptoms that automatically adjust to what a person is doing in real time.
  • Both studies used personalized brain signals, unique to each participant, that specifically indicated different types of movement or activity. 
  • The Swiss study used activity states— for example, recognizing whether a person was sitting, walking, or turning — to switch between optimized stimulation settings.
  • The UCSF study used step-level precision — synchronizing stimulation pulses to the exact rhythm of each individual step – to make adjustments.
  • Both approaches improved walking measures while maintaining the benefits of traditional DBS for other movement symptoms like tremor and stiffness.
  • Neither study reported negative events and showed that these aDBS techniques were well tolerated.
  • Both studies were small (six and five participants). Larger trials are needed to confirm these findings.

What Does This Mean?

Falls are a leading cause of injury and hospitalization for people with Parkinson’s. Since walking is a highly complex activity that requires precise coordination, traditional DBS with consistent stimulation often does not address balance and walking issues. Instead of delivering the same stimulation all the time, adaptive DBS devices adjust in real-time based on the brain’s activity. These studies leveraged this concept to specifically target gait impairment, indicating an important shift in how DBS could help walking symptoms. 

If larger studies confirm these findings, adaptive DBS could offer a meaningful improvement in daily life for people living with Parkinson’s — especially those experiencing gait and balance challenges.

These studies worked by identifying unique, personalized brain signals that were specific to each participant. The algorithms for adaptive DBS were then optimized based on this brain activity — a form of individualized, precision medicine. In addition, the physical location of the participants’ DBS implant varied between studies; the success of both platforms indicates that these treatments can be effective regardless of the DBS implant location, offering hope for more people with Parkinson’s.  

What Does This Mean for People with Parkinson’s?

These studies are in the early stages and have only been tested on a very small number of people. Neither paradigm is ready for widespread clinical use. However, hope lies in the fact that these studies have already moved beyond the lab and are being tested in people living with Parkinson’s. Additionally, the Swiss study used a commercially available DBS neurostimulation device, removing an important barrier to access and suggesting that widespread implementation in the near future may be feasible. 

Next, larger trials will need to confirm the findings to improve features for long-term use and to better understand who would benefit most. People experiencing walking difficulties and falls related to Parkinson’s should talk to their doctor about current treatments and keep an eye out for future adaptive DBS clinical trials. 

Learn More

The Parkinson’s Foundation Helpline (1-800-4PD-INFO) provides answers to questions about PD symptoms and management. Learn more about this topic with the below resources: 

Back to Top