Advancing Research

Ganando terreno: La búsqueda por mejorar e introducir nuevos medicamentos contra el Parkinson

White pill bottles arranged in an organized fashion on a blue background with one bottle spilling pills

El bioquímico Kevin McFarthing recuerda todo acerca de su diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP). "Me lo diagnosticaron a las 4 p.m. del 10 de diciembre de 2012", dijo. Desde entonces, ha estado tras la pista de una cura, catalogando potenciales terapias contra el Parkinson como coeditor de Clinical Trial Highlights, Journal of Parkinson's y organizando a lista Parkinson's Hope List, una base de datos de más de 350 estudios en curso.

En Expert Briefings-Charlas con expertos: Los últimos avances en la investigación y el tratamiento del Parkinson, el Dr. McFarthing comparte los últimos avances en la investigación y de qué manera el participar en estudios clínicos nos acerca a una cura.

La urgencia por avanzar

El Parkinson va en aumento. Un estudio apoyado por la Parkinson's Foundation reveló que 90,000 personas en los EE.UU. son diagnosticadas con la enfermedad cada año. Para 2040, más de 12 millones de personas en todo el mundo vivirán con la EP. Las compañías farmacéuticas están interesadas en acelerar una cura. La identificación de nuevas terapias contra el Parkinson es una de las principales prioridades de la investigación y el desarrollo farmacéuticos.

"Todos tenemos nuestra propia visión de lo que podría significar la cura", dijo el Dr. McFarthing. Para algunos, podría ser "una solución mágica para resolver los síntomas y devolver nuestras capacidades a como éramos antes". Otros podrían esperar "un fármaco que brinde otros 10 años de vida sin síntomas".

Los desafíos

Aunque las compañías farmacéuticas están buscando terapias avanzadas para el Parkinson, los costos son elevados y la competencia por la financiación es fuerte. Innumerables medicamentos de prueba fracasan a menudo en el camino hacia un fármaco de éxito para el sistema nervioso central, como la levodopa (la actual terapia de primera línea contra el Parkinson, descubierta hace más de 50 años).

Según el Centro Tufts para el Estudio del Desarrollo de Medicamentos, una terapia para el sistema nervioso central puede costar más de $2 mil millones en investigación y tardar casi un 20% más que otros fármacos en desarrollarse.

El Parkinson es complejo. Los síntomas se manifiestan de forma diferente en cada persona, lo que dificulta un enfoque único para el tratamiento farmacológico. La participación en la investigación es esencial para descubrir las causas de la enfermedad y encontrar nuevos tratamientos para los síntomas que la gente ve —incluyendo el temblor, la rigidez y la lentitud de movimientos— y los diversos no motores que acompañan a la EP.

Investigaciones diversas y la inversión continua también son esenciales. Por suerte, como señala el Dr. McFarthing, "se está realizando mucho trabajo".

En todo el mundo hay más de 100 estudios que exploran formas de mejorar diversos síntomas de la EP. Más de 250 estudios están investigando posibles terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad, tratamientos que podrían ralentizar, detener o invertir el avance de la enfermedad.

Sacando nuevos tratamientos a la luz

Tras identificar un nuevo tratamiento prometedor para una enfermedad mediante estudios observacionales, animales o celulares, los investigadores buscan financiación y participantes para ensayos clínicos. Estos ensayos, cuidadosamente supervisados, se realizan por fases, —normalmente probando un agente activo frente a un placebo—, para determinar su seguridad y eficacia. Por lo general, una terapia prospectiva debe superar con éxito las fases 1, 2 y 3 antes de que la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos de los EE.UU. (Food and Drug Administration o FDA, por sus siglas en inglés) decida si una empresa puede presentar una solicitud de nuevo fármaco.

Algunos de los estudios de tratamiento a tener en cuenta son:

Terapias para la discinesia (movimientos involuntarios, erráticos y retorcidos), dirigidas a los efectos secundarios asociados al uso prolongado de la levodopa:

  • Celon Pharma S.A. obtuvo resultados positivos de fase 2 con su CPL'36 oral, de una sola toma al día. El fármaco dificulta la actividad de la enzima fosfodiesterasa 10a, aumentando los niveles cerebrales de ciertos mensajeros químicos para mejorar el control motor. 

  • Tras finalizar los ensayos de fase 2B, el mesdopetam (IRL790) de IRLAB no alcanzó los criterios de valoración primarios. Los investigadores siguen evaluando su potencial terapéutico. El fármaco bloquea la actividad del receptor D3 de la dopamina, que puede estar relacionado con la discinesia inducida por la levodopa.

  • La fase 1 de investigación del AV-101 de Vistagen está en curso. El fármaco actúa sobre los receptores de N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDA) que tienen fallas. Unos receptores sanos son fundamentales para la comunicación entre las células nerviosas del cerebro.

  • Se espera que Sinopia Biosciences inicie los ensayos clínicos de un candidato preclínico a fármaco contra la discinesia: el SB-0110.

Este fármaco maximiza el tiempo en “on”, el periodo en que la levodopa proporciona el máximo control de los síntomas. A medida que progresa el Parkinson, la persona puede experimentar más tiempos en “off". Las terapias destinadas a prolongar el tiempo en "on" incluyen:

  • Vyalev (Produodopa en Europa), disponible en los EE.UU. desde 2024. Esta nueva formulación de levodopa está dirigida al Parkinson avanzado. Una bomba portátil administra una infusión constante de medicamento bajo la piel, proporcionando un control más constante de los síntomas. Vyalev también puede mejorar la calidad del sueño, los tiempos en "off" a primera hora de la mañana y otros síntomas.

  • Tavapadon estimula determinados receptores de dopamina para mejorar la función motora y reducir los efectos secundarios. Los agonistas dopaminérgicos actuales no son selectivos y los efectos secundarios pueden incluir comportamientos compulsivos y alucinaciones visuales. Tavapadon proporcionó un buen control de los síntomas en los ensayos de fase 3 como medicación independiente y cuando se utilizó junto con la levodopa. El fabricante, AbbVie, tiene previsto presentar este año una solicitud de nuevo fármaco a la FDA.

La investigación con células madre es un desafío. Implica cirugía cerebral y, tras la implantación de células, se necesita tiempo para ver si los síntomas mejoran. A pesar de los numerosos estudios con células madre para el Parkinson, los investigadores no habían pasado de la fase 2 hasta hace poco:

  • BlueRock Therapeutics, una división de Bayer, presentó datos positivos de fase 1 sobre bemdaneprocel, una terapia celular que busca sustituir las neuronas productoras de dopamina que se pierden a causa del Parkinson. Con base en estos datos, la FDA concedió al fármaco la designación de terapia avanzada de medicina regenerativa, permitiéndole pasar a los ensayos de fase 3 a principios de 2025.

Algunas de las terapias en investigación prometedoras para detener o frenar la progresión de la EP son:

  • Factores de crecimiento neurotróficos, moléculas que estimulan el crecimiento de los nervios. Estos podrían beneficiar a las personas con Parkinson. El AB-1005 de AskBio, un factor neurotrófico derivado de una línea celular glial (GDNF, por sus siglas en inglés) administrado directamente al cerebro, puede minimizar la pérdida de dopamina asociada al Parkinson.

  • Beneficios neuroprotectores potenciales del factor neurotrófico derivado del cerebro y del factor neurotrófico dopaminérgico cerebral.

  • Los inhibidores de la proteína inflamasona NLRP3 pretenden bloquear la activación de moléculas inflamatorias relacionadas con la pérdida de dopamina en el Parkinson.

  • Posibles beneficios neuroprotectores de la nicotinamida ribósida, una forma de la vitamina B3.

Los investigadores también están explorando formas de prevenir la acumulación de la proteína alfa-sinucleína, la proteína que forma cúmulos tóxicos, llamados cuerpos de Lewy, en el cerebro de las personas con la EP:

  • Los estudiso de fase 2 de prasinezumab de Roche, dirigidos a la acumulación y propagación de la alfa-sinucleína. El estudio no alcanzó su objetivo, pero la compañía planea buscar datos que potencialmente muestren beneficios del prasinezumab en el Parkinson inicial.

  • Annovis Bio Fase 3 concluyó recientemente los estudios sobre buntanetap, un fármaco que reduce la producción de alfa-sinucleína. Buntanetap no alcanzó los objetivos del estudio. No obstante, la empresa tiene previsto seguir investigando el fármaco.

  • Las mutaciones en el gen GBA  (que produce la enzima glucocerebrosidasa, o Gcase) son uno de los más frecuentes factores genética de riesgo de la EP. Varias empresas están investigando si los compuestos que estimulan la actividad Gcase pueden mejorar la función motora u ofrecer neuroprotección. 

    • Se ha demostrado que el Ambroxyl, un medicamento para la tos utilizado para reducir la flema, aumenta la actividad de la Gcase en personas con Parkinson. Puede eliminar los cúmulos tóxicos de alfa-sinucleína. Está en marcha un ensayo de fase 3.

  • Las mutaciones del gen LRRK2 son la causa más frecuente de la EP genética. Estudios de investigación en cuatro empresas están explorando cómo los inhibidores de la LRRK2 podrían aportar beneficios neuroprotectores. Otras cinco empresas están en fase de ensayos clínicos.

Otras posibles terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad son los agonistas del GLP-1. Principalmente desarrollados para controlar la diabetes, los agonistas del GLP-1 imitan la hormona humana péptido-1, similar al glucagón (GLP-1), que controla el azúcar en sangre y el apetito.  Algunos delos estudios recientes sobre agonistas del GLP-1 son:

  • Terapia con lixisenatida. Los participantes con la EP inicial en el ensayo de fase 2 experimentaron una menor progresión de la discapacidad motora que el placebo a los 12 meses. Sin embargo, muchos participantes experimentaron efectos secundarios gastrointestinales.

  • La liraglutida mostró una mejoría significativa en algunos síntomas no motores, pero ninguna diferencia en los síntomas motores durante el estudio de fase 2.

  • La investigación de fase 3 sobre la exenatida demostró que el fármaco era seguro y bien tolerado, pero no mostró ninguna ventaja sobre el placebo en el Parkinson.

  • Las investigaciones de fase 2 de NLY01, exenatida modificada, no mostraron mejorías en los síntomas del Parkinson.

  • Los investigadores están a la espera de los resultados de un estudio clínico de fase 2 del Hospital Universitario de Oslo que explora el valor potencial de la semaglutida en el Parkinson.

Construir sobre la esperanza

La única manera de acelerar el desarrollo de tratamientos que puedan ralentizar o detener el Parkinson es a través de una financiación amplificada y continua. El Fondo de Biotecnología Virtual para el Parkinson (Parkinson's Virtual Biotech) , una asociación entre la Parkinson's Foundation y Parkinson's UK, financia 11 nuevos medicamentos y terapias bajo investigación y desarrollo.

La iniciativa Edmond J. Safra Accelerating Clinical Treatments for Parkinson's Disease (EJS-ACT PD, por sus siglas en inglés) tiene como objetivo acelerar las terapias de prueba de fármacos seguros utilizando diseños de ensayos multibrazo y multietapa (MAMS, por sus siglas en inglés), un enfoque más novedoso y rentable.

Los ensayos MAMS permiten a los investigadores evaluar varios tratamientos a la vez contra un placebo. Los investigadores pueden descubrir lo que funciona y descartar lo que no, sin tener que desmontar un ensayo y empezar de nuevo. El objetivo es facilitar una transición fluida y rentable a la siguiente fase de los ensayos y comercializar más rápidamente nuevas terapias eficaces. Hay otros ensayos MAMS para Parkinson en marcha en todo el mundo.

"Esperamos tener más fracasos que éxitos debido a la naturaleza de lo que intentamos hacer", dijo McFarthing. "Pero creemos que algo resultará de esto".

Cómo participar en la investigación sobre el Parkinson:

  1. Participar en PD GENEration.

  2. Únase a un ensayo o estudio sobre el Parkinson.

  3. Conviértase en defensor de la investigación.

Advancing Research

Fueling Discovery: 9 Research Projects Funded by Parkinson’s Foundation Grants

Researcher working on computer

Taking on a disease as complex as Parkinson’s disease (PD) requires the best scientific minds in the world and the ability to fund innovative ideas. The next Parkinson’s research breakthrough can happen in any lab, at any time. Parkinson’s Foundation research grants exist to decipher this disease and find new ways to stop it from progressing. 

“Many of our grant-funded researchers pursue high-risk projects unlikely to receive federal funding. These projects push the envelope of research and are the kinds of projects the Parkinson’s community eagerly awaits — those that explore the potential for new treatments based on the science behind Parkinson’s,” said James Beck, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer at the Parkinson's Foundation. 

Explore nine Parkinson’s Foundation-funded studies below divided into three critical research avenues:  

  • New movement symptom treatments. 

  • How gut bacteria and PD are related. 

  • How aging impacts PD development and progression. 

9 research studies infographic

Go in depth into each study below:  

Investigating how gut bacteria play a role in PD 

1. Searching for gut bacteria that may lead to PD. 

Chris Smillie, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Impact Award, is using cutting-edge genetic techniques to find bacterial cells associated with PD, identify how their activity and function may contribute to the disease and how we might be able to target gut bacteria to slow, stop or prevent disease progression.

Learn more

2. How gut bacteria influence levodopa effectiveness. 

Christine Olson, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Launch Award and a previous Postdoctoral Fellow, is researching a certain type of bacteria in the gut she suspects may impact the effectiveness of levodopa. She’s also investigating whether there are ways to use targeted antibiotics to improve levodopa use.

Learn more

3. Exploring gut health biomarkers as early indicators for PD. 

Trisha Pasricha, MD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Impact Award, aims to compare the gut biology of people with and without Parkinson’s using new technology to discover the biomarkers of PD-linked bloating and nausea to improve future diagnoses.

Learn more

Searching for treatments for movement symptoms 

4. Using ultrasound stimulation to address freezing of gait.

Amitabh Bhattacharya, PhD, recipient of the Parkinson’s Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship, is investigating if non-invasive ultrasound stimulation could reduce freezing of gait symptoms without the need for invasive surgery.

Learn more

5. Treating levodopa-induced movement symptoms.

Jeroen Habets, MD, PhD, recipient of the Parkinson’s Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship, is working to identify brain wave “biomarkers” of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), highlighting regions of the brain that go awry during LID and could be targeted by magnetic stimulation therapy to reduce or eliminate LID completely.

Learn more

6. Improving deep brain stimulation to treat movement symptoms. 

Coralie de Hemptinne, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Stanley Fahn Junior Faculty Award  is searching for a way to improve deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy for PD by developing a process that would automatically program DBS devices.

Learn more

Studying how aging impacts PD development and progression 

7. Boosting brain immune cells as a new preventative PD therapy. 

Rebecca Wallings, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Launch Award, is investigating how aging impairs a certain type of immune cell outside the brain — and how this impairment impacts cells within the brain that contribute to the development of PD.

Learn more

8. Exploring DNA “safety caps” as a source of neuron loss in PD. 

Edward Burton, MD, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Impact Award, is researching how the damage of telomeres, the protective “caps” on chromosomes linked to aging, may contribute to neuron loss in Parkinson’s.

Learn more

9. Untangling the connections between inflammation, aging and PD. 

Sarah Talley, PhD, recipient of the Parkinson’s Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship, is studying how “inflammaging,” age-related inflammation, may worsen the spread of alpha-synuclein clumps in brain, with the hope of better understanding how anti-inflammatory therapies could be used to treat people with PD.

Learn more

Meet more Parkinson’s researchers! Explore our My PD Stories featuring PD researchers.  

Fact Sheets

Steps to Prepare for a Parkinson’s Appointment

Start preparing at least two weeks before your next Parkinson's disease (PD) appointment so you’re ready to talk about what matters most to you.

Use this worksheet to choose your top three appointment topics. Consider working on it with someone you trust for another point of view.

Part 1: Think About How Parkinson’s Affects Your Life

Keep notes on PD concerns between appointments. Use a journal, send yourself an email, record a voice memo or use an app.

Consider each of these areas:

  • Physical health
  • Mental health
  • Family & friends
  • Work
  • Everyday activities, chores
  • Activities you enjoy, hobbies

Step 1) Symptoms: Reflect on what’s new or different.

  • Which symptoms bother you most? How do they impact your daily life?
  • What makes symptoms worse or better?
  • Did changes made at your last appointment help with symptoms (medications, therapy, diet)?
  • Have your family or friends noticed any changes?

Step 2) Goals: Consider what matters most to you.

  • What are you focused on right now (work, family, hobbies, travel)?
  • What activities do you want to keep doing?
  • Do symptoms make it hard to do the things you enjoy?

Step 3) Concerns: Think about your biggest questions or worries.

  • Are you worried about medications (not lasting as long, costs, side effects)?
  • How is Parkinson’s affecting your relationships?
  • Do you need help finding Parkinson’s resources and support?

Part 2: Decide What is Most Important for this Appointment

Step 4) Choose your top 3 topics for the appointment.

Now that you’ve reflected, think about what's affecting your daily life and needs to be addressed as soon as possible. Finish this sentence:

“If I can only discuss three things with my healthcare team during this visit, the most important are ______________.”

Step 5) Write down your top 3 topics.

Write topics in priority order and bring the list to share at the start of your next appointment. Be as specific as you can. For symptoms, include how often you have them and at what time of day they happen. Consider bringing a video of movement symptoms to show your healthcare team.

Important Reminders

  • Share any symptom that bothers you, even if you’re not sure it’s related to PD.
  • Bring a list of all your medications to your visits, including non-PD medications. Include the time you take them and the amount.
  • If possible, take someone you trust with you to appointments.
  • Learn about PD symptoms and treatments to help you communicate with your care team.

Need Help?

Contact the Parkinson’s Foundation Helpline at 1-800-4PD-INFO (473-4636) or Helpine@Parkinson.org. Our Helpline team can:

  • Help you prepare before an appointment.
  • Answer PD questions you didn’t address during appointments.
  • Locate PD specialists, support groups and exercise classes near you.
Advancing Research

Engaging the Parkinson’s Community in Research: The Path to Better Treatments

Woman sitting at desk working on computer

PD community involvement in trial design outshines recent clinical trial outcomes 

The role of people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in shaping research has never been more critical than today. “People living with Parkinson’s are experts, they have the lived experience and should be engaged as equal partners in the drug development process,” said Evelyn Stevens, Parkinson’s Foundation Senior Director of Community Engagement.  

One avenue of engagement is the Patient Engagement Council for Parkinson’s Research (PECPR). Established in 2021, the PECPR has worked to ensure that the Parkinson’s community has a seat at the table in drug development. A collaboration between UCB, the Parkinson’s Foundation, Parkinson’s UK, and five people living with Parkinson’s, the council believes patient insights should guide research priorities.  

The goal of the PECPR was to engage those with PD in research and trial design, guiding development toward results that will most impact and benefit their lives. The council: 

  1. Developed a “playbook” for including people with Parkinson’s feedback, ensuring that medicines are designed to address what matters most to the PD community. 

  1. Prioritized accessibility and inclusivity in all stages of treatment research, so that treatments are developed with the wide diversity of the PD community in mind. 

  1. Advanced the field of disease-modifying therapies for PD, which seek to slow, stop, or even reverse the disease progression rather than simply treat its symptoms. 

The council’s efforts were recognized when it won a 2024 Made with Patients award from the Patient Focused Medicines Development, underscoring the impact of patient-driven collaboration. 

PECPR played a key role in shaping a recent clinical study called ORCHESTRA, testing the efficacy of the pharmaceutical company UCB’s drug, minzasolmin. Unfortunately, in December 2024, UCB announced the study did not meet its efficacy goals. Days later, another pharmaceutical company, Roche, announced similar results — their intravenous PD drug called prasinezumab also missed the primary endpoint, but suggests possible benefit in early-stage PD.  

Both drugs were designed to slow the progression of PD by targeting a protein called alpha-synuclein normally found in the brain. When this protein is mishappen and builds up in the brain it disrupts brain function and leads to PD symptoms. Neither drug significantly slowed disease progression in trial participants when compared to the participant group that received a placebo.  

“Developing effective disease-modifying PD treatments comes with numerous challenges,” said Maggie Caulfield, PhD, Director of Research at the Parkinson’s Foundation. “One concern is that a therapy needs to reach the right area in the brain, get into the right cells, and interact with a particular molecule — all in a system where cells in the brain are already unhealthy.” 

While the minzasolmin trial did not yield the hoped-for results, PECPR’s mission remains unchanged: to push for research that directly addresses the real needs of people with Parkinson’s.  

Looking ahead, PECPR is focused on expanding patient engagement strategies, refining accessibility in research, and continuing to advocate for treatments that go beyond symptom management to fundamentally change the course of Parkinson’s.  

Strengthening the Odds of Finding New Disease Modifying Therapies 

While trial failures for disease modifying therapies for PD are disappointing, they ultimately provide researchers with new, valuable data that will guide the next round of treatments. Researchers can utilize data (positive and negative results) to help overcome previous biological hurdles.  

“Parkinson’s researchers will keep trying and tweaking until we have the next breakthrough,” said Dr. Caulfield, “There are all kinds of different ways that researchers and clinicians are trying to reach disease related targets, we just have to keep pushing and eventually something will work.” 

One area where patient engagement is vital is in genetics research. Understanding the genetic factors behind PD can help researchers develop more targeted, effective treatments. Pharmaceutical companies are already partnering with people with PD to improve their clinical trials that are based on genetic ties to PD. 

Studies like the Parkinson’s Foundation PD GENEration: Mapping the Future of Parkinson’s Disease are advancing this effort by offering free genetic testing and counseling to people with PD. By identifying genetic variants linked to PD, researchers can uncover new pathways for treatment — bringing the field closer to personalized medicine, where therapies can be tailored to a person’s genetic profile. 

“There is a lot of hope in understanding Parkinson’s through genetics and leveraging study data to find the next disease modifying treatment,” said Evelyn. 

Patience, Perseverance and Continued Progress 

Every person with PD experiences unique symptoms and disease progression. These differences can be related to genetics, environment, age or other factors, all of which make finding new, effective disease-modifying therapies for PD a daunting task.  

As PD research moves forward, the involvement of the PD community is invaluable and critical. Groups like PECPR and Parkinson’s Foundation research advocates ensure that the experiences of those with PD guide treatment development in ways most beneficial to the PD community.  

“It’s an exciting time to see so many researchers and industry partners wanting to listen and learn from those living with Parkinson’s,” said Evelyn. “That’s what community engagement is all about — it’s a collaborative process where we combine our experience and expertise to improve the health of those living with Parkinson’s. That’s what will lead us to a cure for PD” 

Learn More 

The Parkinson’s Foundation works to improve care for people with PD and advance research toward a cure. 

  • Learn about PD GENEration: our global genetics study that provides genetic testing and counseling at no cost for people with Parkinson’s. 

Fact Sheets

Exploring Next Steps in Care

Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects each person differently, but it typically progresses slowly over time. As your symptoms change, you may need to rely on more support and care. There are many options to help manage these changes, based on your needs, preferences and resources.

When is it time to get more help?

Start by having open and regular conversations with loved ones and your care team. Discuss everyone's needs, what's working well, where things are getting harder and any safety concerns. Signs that extra help may be needed include difficulty with daily tasks, falls, changes in behavior and thinking or care partner fatigue. The goal is to find a balance that keeps you safe and supports the best quality of life.

Key Questions When Considering Care:

  • Is staying active or social difficult?
  • Are treatments hard to manage?
  • Are daily tasks like getting out of bed or bathing a struggle?
  • Do you need help with transportation?
  • Is the care partner feeling stressed, at risk of burnout or in need of respite?
  • Does the care partner have health issues?
  • Are there safety concerns, such as falls, getting lost, or managing medications?
  • Is getting around your home challenging due to stairs or other barriers?

Care Options

Knowing your choices and planning ahead can help make it easier to navigate changes as they come up.

Home-Based Support

Services that can help support a person living at home include:

  • Family & Friends —Depending on ability and availability, may help with household tasks, personal care, medications, driving and support
  • Meal & Transportation Services — Meal delivery, rides to appointments
  • Personal Care Aide, Homemaker & Companion Care — Help with errands, housekeeping, daily living activities like dressing and bathing, medication reminders, meal prep and companionship
  • Short-Term Skilled Care — Short-term nursing care and therapy (must be homebound and medically necessary for insurance coverage)
  • Adult Day Programs — Social activities, meals, care during the day
  • Respite Care in Residential Settings — Short-term overnight stays

Care Communities

Housing options that offer different levels of support include:

  • Independent Living — Activities, meals, housekeeping
  • Assisted Living — Help with daily activities, medication management, dining services, wellness programs, social opportunities, transportation
  • Residential Care Homes — Smaller home settings with 24/7 support from care staff and on-call nursing
  • Skilled Nursing — 24/7 care for more complex needs and rehab
  • Continuing Care Retirement Community — A range of care from independent to skilled nursing
  • Dementia Care — Available in some assisted living and skilled nursing facilities, includes memory support and specialized care

Parkinson's-Specific Care

Finding care with staff experienced in PD can be difficult. Be sure to ask if the care team offers support for movement challenges, medication management, mood changes and whether exercise and rehab are available on-site.

The Parkinson's Foundation Community Partners in Parkinson's Care program trains care staff to support the complex needs of people with PD. Contact our Helpline to explore local resources, including any participating sites in your area. For more information, visit Parkinson.org/CommunityPartners.

Paying for Care

Medicare and private insurance do not cover many of the costs associated with care. Depending on your situation, Medicaid, Veterans benefits or long-term care insurance may be available to help. An elder law attorney and financial planner with expertise in long-term care planning can help you understand your options.

Tips for Finding Local Care Resources

  • Ask your support network for recommendations, including family, friends, members of your support group and care team.
  • Do your research. Review background checks, references and online reviews. Arrange tours and interviews and invite a friend or family member for support.
  • Rely on trusted organizations, like the Parkinson's Foundation and your local Area Agency on Aging, for guidance and resources.
Advancing Research

Neuro Talk: What’s Next for PD Research

Parkinson’s disease (PD) research has changed drastically over the last few decades. In the past, scientists approached PD research more broadly, often applying general neurological concepts rather than focusing specifically on the unique aspects of PD itself. Today, the field has advanced to include more specific treatments and interventions tailored to address the symptoms and underlying causes of PD directly, offering new possibilities for more effective care and management

Dr. James Beck, Chief Scientific Officer of the Parkinson’s Foundation, alongside a few of the Parkinson’s Foundation research grantees discuss the advancements in PD research, how the field has transformed and where it is headed in the future. 

Advancing Research

Meet a Researcher Investigating a Missing Link Between Genetic Mutation and Protein Clumping in PD

Dr. Silas Buck

After decades of research, several genetic mutations have been linked to Parkinson’s disease (PD) but we do not fully understand how these mutations cause PD. 

One such PD-associated mutation leads to the production of a malfunctioning version of the protein Leucine Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2). Faulty LRRK2 is believed to disrupt several important processes within neurons and consequently contribute to PD progression, but how exactly these disruptions lead to the disease is still being studied. 

When looking at the posthumous brain tissue of people who had LRRK2-mutant PD, scientists have routinely seen unhealthy aggregates or clumps of a protein called tau. Similar to alpha-synuclein clumping, tau clumping is believed to contribute to the disease-related breakdown of dopamine neurons and is associated with PD dementia.   

Silas Buck, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship, is investigating how a relatively understudied protein called Histone Deacetylase 6 (HDAC6), which is responsible for regulating tau and keeping it from clumping, may be affected by mutant LRRK2 and drive PD-related cellular breakdown.  

“What I’m studying is how LRRK2 may cause the accumulation of a protein called tau. When tau is misfolded, it can accumulate into these clumps in the brain cells and that can cause neurons, or brain cells, to degenerate and lead to not just movement symptoms, but tau, specifically, is also associated with the cognitive symptoms that are seen in Parkinson’s. So, addressing the cause of tau protein accumulation can potentially treat non-movement symptoms in people with PD,” said Dr. Buck. 

Using neurons grown in petri dishes, Dr. Buck will first measure how much LRRK2 and HDAC6 interact in healthy brain cells.   

Then, he will introduce mutant LRRK2 into those cells and analyze how that affects the LRRK2-HDAC6 interactions and if such changes result in tau clumping. Finally, Dr. Buck will investigate if mutant LRRK2’s impact on HDAC6 also contributes to disrupted mitochondria repair and cleanup, another cellular stressor commonly seen in PD brain tissue.   

Uncovering more biochemical links in the chain between gene mutation and PD means more opportunities to intervene in the disease’s progression. Through Dr. Buck’s experiments, we will understand more about HDAC6’s role in PD development and how it could be the target of new future therapies, expanding the effective medication options and improving doctors’ ability to provide genetically personalized treatment plans for people with Parkinson’s. 

“Studying these proteins and how they are dysfunctional in Parkinson’s disease can inform us not just about those genetic cases but also how Parkinson’s disease forms in cases that do not have a clear genetic form as well,” Dr. Buck said. 

“This fellowship from the Parkinson’s Foundation is key to helping me develop into a fully independent scientist and investigator, where I can one day have my own research program and run my own lab to continue investigating mechanisms of degeneration in Parkinson’s disease,” Dr. Buck said. “Receiving this postdoctoral fellowship allows me to pursue my passion of performing exciting and important research that could one day help substantially improve the lives of people with Parkinson’s disease. It has always been my dream to make a difference in the health of others through research, and I hope to achieve that through this project.”  

Meet more Parkinson’s researchers! Explore our My PD Stories featuring PD researchers

Advancing Research

Actualización: Un nuevo estudio revela que fármacos como el Ozempic son ineficaces en el tratamiento del Parkinson

ozempic pen injection

Este mes de febrero, un nuevo estudio publicado en la revista médica The Lancet ha despertado importantes dudas acerca de la eficacia potencial de la clase de fármacos para la diabetes agonistas del receptor GLP-1 en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP).  

Un ensayo clínico de fase 3 evaluó el agonista del receptor de GLP-1 llamado Exenatida. El estudio, que constó de 194 participantes a quienes se dio seguimiento durante dos años, encontró que el uso diario de Exenatide no proporcionó ninguna mejora significativa para los síntomas del Parkinson en comparación con el placebo. Esta falta de mejora fue consistente en todos los grupos de edad, sexos y estadios de la EP. Los investigadores también realizaron tomografías computarizadas (CT scan) del cerebro antes y después del estudio en participantes seleccionados y descubrieron que la Exenatida no afectaba la actividad dopaminérgica en las regiones cerebrales relevantes para la EP. 

Estos resultados sugieren que los actuales medicamentos agonistas del receptor GLP-1 no son eficaces como tratamientos modificadores de la enfermedad de Parkinson. A medida que los científicos aprendan más acerca de la vía biológica del GLP-1 y cómo afecta la salud de las neuronas dopaminérgicas, es probable que en el futuro se desarrollen y se pongan a prueba nuevos medicamentos con GLP-1 específicamente diseñados para el Parkinson. 

¿Podrían los medicamentos para la diabetes como el Ozempic ser un tratamiento para el Parkinson? 

Un ensayo clínico de lixisenatida, un fármaco aprobado por la FDA en 2016 para tratar la diabetes, mostró potencial para reducir los síntomas motores en personas con Parkinson 

La enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) es un trastorno neurodegenerativo en el que las células cerebrales productoras de dopamina se descomponen lentamente con el paso del tiempo. Esta pérdida de dopamina provoca diversos síntomas motores, como temblor, rigidez, lentitud de movimientos y problemas con el equilibrio. Aunque los tratamientos actuales pueden ayudar a controlar muchos de los síntomas de la EP, no abordan las causas de la enfermedad y, por lo tanto, no pueden evitar su progresión.  

Nuevas investigaciones sugieren una posible relación entre la disminución de la sensibilidad del cerebro a la hormona insulina y la progresión del Parkinson. Esta observación ha llevado a los investigadores a estudiar si los medicamentos antidiabéticos que ayudan a controlar los niveles de insulina podrían ralentizar la progresión del Parkinson. 

Los fármacos Ozempic y Wegovy pertenecen a una clase de medicamentos para la diabetes llamados agonistas de los receptores GLP-1 que, junto con algunos otros medicamentos para la diabetes, han mostrado potencial para reducir el riesgo de desarrollar Parkinson en personas con diabetes. Estos fármacos imitan la acción de una hormona natural que regula los niveles de azúcar en sangre. 

Sin embargo, se desconoce si los fármacos agonistas del receptor GLP-1 pueden beneficiar a las personas con Parkinson que no tienen diabetes. 

Un reciente ensayo clínico, publicado en el New England Journal of Medicine, analizó si un agonista del GLP-1 llamado lixisenatida podría ofrecer un nuevo enfoque de tratamiento para las personas en los primeros estadios del Parkinson. El estudio mostró que la lixisenatida, que fue aprobada por la FDA en 2016 para ayudar a los diabéticos a controlar el azúcar en la sangre, ayudó con los síntomas motores en personas con la EP y podría ralentizar la progresión del Parkinson.  

Como parte de este estudio, un modelo de ratón del Parkinson demostró que la lixisenatida mejoraba los problemas motores y preservaba las células cerebrales, lo que sugiere que los agonistas del GLP-1 podrían tratar las causas subyacentes de la EP.  

Además, la lixisenatida no es el único agonista del receptor GLP-1 con potenciales aplicaciones terapéuticas para el Parkinson: al menos otros seis medicamentos similares están bajo evaluación actualmente como tratamiento potencial para la EP. Sin embargo, en comparación con la liraglutida y la semaglutida (como Wegovy), la lixisenatida parece ser más eficaz en atravesar la barrera hematoencefálica. 

Resultados del estudio 

El nuevo estudio, —un ensayo clínico de fase 2—, reclutó a 156 personas con Parkinson, que fueron asignadas aleatoriamente para recibir lixisenatida o un placebo. Los participantes fueron diagnosticados con Parkinson dentro de los tres años anteriores y estaban tomando medicamentos dopaminérgicos, como la levodopa y continuaron haciéndolo durante el ensayo. Para cada participante, los investigadores evaluaron los síntomas antes del tratamiento con la inyección diaria de placebo o lixisenatida y 12 meses después. 

Tras 12 meses de tratamiento, las personas que recibieron lixisenatida mostraron mejores resultados en sus síntomas motores en comparación con las que recibieron un placebo. Mientras que los síntomas motores del grupo de lixisenatida no cambiaron en comparación con el inicio del ensayo, el grupo de placebo experimentó un empeoramiento de sus síntomas.  

Tras 12 meses de tomar lixisenatida o un placebo, los participantes se sometieron a dos meses sin ningún tratamiento y se volvieron a evaluar los síntomas. El grupo de lixisenatida mostró mejores síntomas motores en comparación con el grupo de control después de dos meses, lo que sugiere que la lixisenatida puede tener un impacto positivo en la progresión de la enfermedad.  

Cabe destacar que los que recibieron lixisenatida tuvieron más efectos secundarios gastrointestinales: un 46% de los participantes que tomaron lixisenatida tuvieron náuseas y 13% experimentaron vómitos. Aproximadamente un tercio de los participantes (28 personas) que recibieron lixisenatida optaron por una dosis inferior durante el estudio debido a los efectos secundarios. 

Destacados 

  • En el estudio participaron 156 personas con Parkinson, que fueron asignadas aleatoriamente a recibir una inyección diaria de lixisenatida (un agonista del GLP-1) o un placebo. 

  • Tras un año de tratamiento, las personas que recibieron lixisenatida mostraron mejores resultados en sus síntomas motores en comparación con las que recibieron un placebo. 

  • La lixisenatida provocó efectos secundarios gastrointestinales en muchos participantes: un 46% tuvo náuseas y un 13% experimentó vómitos. 

¿Qué significa esto para los medicamentos del GLP-1 y el Parkinson? 

Este estudio puede indicar que ciertos agonistas del GLP-1 podrían ser beneficiosos para reducir ciertos síntomas del Parkinson. Estos prometedores resultados inspirarán más investigaciones sobre los efectos a largo plazo de la lixisenatida en la progresión de la EP.  

Este estudio tenía un tamaño de muestra pequeño y sólo evaluó el fármaco en los recién diagnosticados (diagnosticados en los últimos tres años). Se necesitan estudios más amplios, con un número significativamente mayor de participantes que vivan con rangos más amplios de los estadios de la EP, antes de que podamos establecer una conexión entre los agonistas del GLP-1 y el control de los síntomas o la progresión de la enfermedad.  

Por último, actualmente se están investigando muchos agonistas del GLP-1 para el tratamiento de la EP y otros fármacos similares han mostrado resultados menos prometedores en comparación con la lixisenatida. Se necesitan más investigaciones para comprender las diferencias entre los distintos agonistas del GLP-1 sobre los síntomas de la EP.  

¿Qué significan estos hallazgos para las personas con la EP en este momento? 

Actualmente, los agonistas del GLP-1 sólo están aprobados para el tratamiento de la diabetes y la obesidad. Las personas con Parkinson que también tienen diabetes y obesidad deben hablar con su médico antes de empezar a tomar un agonista del GLP-1. Actualmente no hay pruebas suficientes que respalden el uso de agonistas del GLP-1 como la lixisenatida como tratamiento para las personas con Parkinson que no tienen diabetes ni obesidad.  

Además, la pérdida de peso asociada a los agonistas del GLP-1 puede ser un problema para las muchas personas con Parkinson que experimentan una pérdida de peso involuntaria a lo largo de la enfermedad.  

Cabe destacar que la lixisenatida ya no está disponible en los EE.UU.  

Aprenda más 

La Parkinson’s Foundation cree en el empoderamiento de la comunidad de Parkinson a través de la educación. Aprenda más acerca de la EP y de los temas en este artículo a través de nuestros recursos mencionados abajo o llame a nuestra Línea de Ayuda gratuita al 1-800-4PD-INFO (1-800-473-4636), opción 3 para español, para obtener respuestas a sus preguntas acerca del Parkinson. 

My PD Story

Craig Meurlin headshot
People with PD

Craig Meurlin

My father was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in the mid-to-late 90s and he lived with PD until his passing in 2012. I was diagnosed with PD in 2019, and I was quickly frustrated that I was being given the same drug for PD my father had used 30 years ago.  

It seemed an inordinately long time to not have progressed more with treatments and drugs. Certainly, there were some advances to treat Parkinson’s symptoms, like deep brain stimulation (DBS), but it all seemed to circle back to the primary PD drug carbidopa-levodopa

As I navigated this reality, and my Parkinson’s symptoms, I eventually connected with the Parkinson’s Foundation. I appreciated that the Foundation’s resources made clear that Parkinson’s is not just a movement disorder. Some neurologists I have dealt with don’t seem to care as much about the non-movement symptoms, and I have those in spades (and had them for a number of years before my actual PD diagnosis).  

Learning about how PD impacts so many systems in my body and how common these non-movement symptoms are through the Foundation has been helpful and is just one part of the personalized approach the Foundation does so wonderfully. That personalized approach is why I began to financially support the Foundation. 

What meaningfully differentiated the Parkinson’s Foundation from the other PD charities in my mind was when I learned about the Foundation’s Parkinson’s Virtual Biotech initiative. I truly became excited as it seemed to me to be an optimal approach to accelerate research on developing new treatment options as well as finding the cause of PD. The usual institutional approach has not seemed, to me at least, to have made the kind of progress needed, particularly considering the significant increase in the number of people being diagnosed with PD.  

Real, original research and development often occurs through the efforts of individuals who do not accept the status quo and believe enough in their own work to take the risks (and those risks are significant) of stepping out on their own to accelerate the development of their ideas. Things can get caught up in the bureaucracy of larger institutions (and, in some institutions, perhaps “group think”) that dampens both the creativity and speed of innovation needed for truly breakthrough developments.  

I was looking for something to support that was nimbler and led by people with real passion and belief in their own work, and I found it in the Parkinson’s Virtual Biotech initiative. The initiative’s combination of science and private entrepreneurialism is an excellent way to accelerate advances in applied research and development. Through this initiative, the Foundation makes venture capital investments in early-stage companies focused on PD research and development.   

Additionally, the Parkinson’s Virtual Biotech uses an investment model I am familiar with and have seen work successfully a number of times throughout my 40-year career as a corporate lawyer with a particular focus in securities law.  

I know the various stages of the venture capital process, the need to do significant technical due diligence and to properly evaluate a company’s management team to be comfortable with their ability to develop and follow through on a business plan to achieve the scientific and commercial objectives of the project.   

I like the fact that Parkinson’s Virtual Biotech investments in a company are made in stages based on the company’s achievement of certain milestones. The Parkinson’s Foundation and Parkinson’s UK have the resources to do that due diligence and keep the focus on Parkinson’s disease. They also mentor the management teams when necessary to assist in their success.  

I believe that through the Parkinson’s Virtual Biotech, the Parkinson’s Foundation can make a real difference in efforts to advance treatment options and ultimately cure Parkinson’s disease. Where else can you find the expertise (both in PD and in venture capital investments) found in the Parkinson’s Foundation and Parkinson’s UK, the access to many investment opportunities that are brought to this initiative and the management mentoring to move these projects forward?  I am unaware of other PD focused organizations doing this and it is something that I am very passionate about supporting it. 

I believe this model has the best chance to work for Parkinson’s and to make leaps of progress that are important if we hope to slow disease progression, eventually stop other people from getting it and finally learn what causes Parkinson’s disease. I would encourage anyone to join me in supporting the Parkinson’s Virtual Biotech initiative. 

Learn more about Parkinson’s Virtual Biotech and make a gift to support this exciting work. 

My PD Story

Julie Obreiter selfie
People with PD

Julie Obreiter

My name is Julie, and I was diagnosed with young-onset Parkinson’s disease (YOPD) in 2018 at the age of 44. Since my diagnosis, my most prominent symptoms have been rigidity, slowness of movement, and foot dystonia.  

Part of my PD journey involves a scary hospital experience in 2023. While my daughter and I were on a cross-country road trip together I began experiencing severe dyskinesia (involuntary, erratic, writhing movements of the face, arms, legs or trunk) and cramping. This is fairly common for me, and sometimes, when this happens, I use THC (medical marijuana) to find relief.  

However, when I did this time, I became unresponsive, which had never happened before. My daughter pulled over to call 911 and an ambulance transported me to the hospital. 

The next thing I knew, I woke up in the ER. I thought I was having a bad dream. My daughter explained to the medical team that I have Parkinson’s, and like many others, use THC to help manage my symptoms.  

The ER team was convinced I was a drug addict and treated me like I had done something wrong. My daughter and I were both shocked and scared. They didn’t believe I had Parkinson’s, and they refused to perform any tests or allow me to take my Parkinson’s medications. 

Unfortunately, it took several hours to convince the medical team that my Parkinson’s medications were essential. Once they realized these weren’t street drugs, my medications were administered, and my symptoms became under control.  

The doctor neglected to contact my neurologist, and further testing was never done. I was treated carelessly and discharged the same day. When I talked with my neurologist after the hospitalization, he said that I experienced a “dystonic storm.”  

Since then, I have taken time to process this traumatic experience and learned how to advocate for myself as a person with Parkinson’s. Most recently, I underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery that changed my life — and greatly improved my symptoms.  

While we don’t always know when we are headed for a hospital stay or ER visit, there are ways to prepare. The Parkinson’s Foundation Hospital Safety Guide can help you and your loved ones prepare before your next planned or unplanned hospital visit so that you feel prepared to navigate the hospital with confidence. 

Advocate for your best care with the Hospital Safety Guide. Learn more and download the guide now

Back to Top