James Beck, PhD, Parkinson's Foundation Chief Scientific Officer, gives us a high-level overview of what goes on in the brain that leads to a Parkinson’s disease (PD) diagnosis. In this Neuro Talk, Dr. Beck also discusses the key symptoms of PD ― motor and non-motor ― types of Parkinson’s, progression and ongoing research initiatives… all in less than four minutes.
The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is expected to double in the next 20 years. To date, there are no proven strategies for slowing the progression of PD. A calcium channel blocker medication used to treat hypertension called, Isradipine, has been shown to be neuroprotective in animal models of PD. Several studies of people also indicated the possibility that taking Isradipine may reduce the risk for PD.
A study published in Annals of Internal Medicine, “Isradipine Versus Placebo in Early Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Trial” (Parkinson Study Group, 2020), sought to determine if treatment with Isradipine was effective in slowing the progression early-stage PD (within three years of diagnosis). The study lead was Tanya Simuni, MD, of the Parkinson’s Foundation Center of Excellence at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study recruited participants from 57 Parkinson Study Group sites from the U.S. and Canada. All 336 participants (68% men, 32% women) had been diagnosed with early PD, were 30 years of age or older, had minimal disability and none were taking any dopamine medication.
For 36 months, approximately half of the participants were given 5mg of immediate release Isradipine twice daily, and 166 were given a placebo, also twice daily. Motor function, cognitive function, global measures of disability, functional status and quality of life were measured at baseline, and again at the study conclusion.
Results
While the study research was sound, unfortunately the data revealed that Isradipine did not slow PD progression. Unwanted side effects occurred in less than 5% of the participants, with dizziness and edema (water retention) being the most common.
What Does This Mean?
Compared to taking a placebo, taking 5mg of Isradipine twice daily over the course of 36 months confers no protective benefit in slowing the progression of PD. In other words, the Isradipine did not work as hoped.
Important Recommendation
It is recommended that those who decided to take Isradipine ― who were not part of the study ― discuss the next steps with their doctors. Long-term use of anti-hypertensives in Parkinson’s can sometimes lead to passing out especially if not monitored and managed. This is because in Parkinson disease, both progression and dopamine medications can lower blood pressure. Long-term, many patients cut down anti-hypertensive drug dosages and sometimes even discontinue these medications.
Learn More
Learn more about Parkinson’s and medications in the following Parkinson’s Foundation resources or by calling our free Helpline at 1-800-4PD-INFO (473-4636):
Benkert, J., Hess, S., Roy, S., Beccano-Kelly, D., Wiederspohn, N., Duda, J., . . . Liss, B. (2019). Cav2.3 channels contribute to dopaminergic neuron loss in a model of Parkinson's disease. Nat Commun, 10(1), 5094. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12834-x
Oertel, W., & Schulz, J. B. (2016). Current and experimental treatments of Parkinson disease: A guide for neuroscientists. J Neurochem, 139 Suppl 1, 325-337. doi:10.1111/jnc.13750
Parkinson Study Group, S.-P. D. I. I. I. I. (2020). Isradipine Versus Placebo in Early Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. doi:10.7326/M19-2534
Surmeier, D. J., Schumacker, P. T., Guzman, J. D., Ilijic, E., Yang, B., & Zampese, E. (2017). Calcium and Parkinson's disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 483(4), 1013-1019. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.168
Medical Cannabis Convening Findings: Top Takeaways and Guidance
Many people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) have looked to medical cannabis (marijuana) to provide some relief to their range of non-motor and motor symptoms. However, little is known about the effects of medical cannabis for PD symptoms or their potential side effects and safety issues. To address this, the Parkinson’s Foundation published a statement to help guide the PD community in making informed decisions about using cannabis for Parkinson’s.
The statement is based on the input from experts who attended the Parkinson’s Foundation first-ever medical marijuana convening in March 2019. These 46 experts included neurologists, scientists, a pharmacist, a PD nurse, non-profit organizations, people with Parkinson’s and Foundation staff.
The primary goal of the statement is to provide guidance to people with Parkinson’s and their physicians for the safe use of medical cannabis for PD. The secondary goal is to establish cannabis and PD topics that should be addressed through rigorous research studies.
Regardless of whether a medical cannabis product is approved for Parkinson’s in the future, this statement will help to inform that it is used in the safest, most effective way possible.
Top Takeaways on the Use of Medical Cannabis for PD
Our experts urge caution. There are adverse effects, toxicity issues and drug to drug interactions, and we do not fully know what this means for people with PD who are taking PD medications.
We cannot endorse the use of medical cannabis for PD symptoms or disease progression because we need more data. However, because we realize that people with PD are interested in cannabis, we feel it is necessary to provide guidance for general safety as well as working with dispensaries.
We need better studies. Some studies have suggested cannabis may be beneficial for non-motor symptoms such as sleep disturbances, pain, anxiety and gastrointestinal issues. However, these studies are generally small and are not conducted the most reliable kind of research studies.
Guidance for Using Cannabis for Parkinson’s
Without any clear data supporting the use of cannabinoid products in PD, while the Parkinson’s Foundation does not endorse their use in PD, we recognize that people may decide to try cannabinoid products for certain symptoms. If you decide to try cannabinoid products:
What is CBD?
Cannabidiol (CBD) and hemp products (defined as having less than 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol - THC) are legally available in all 50 states.
Discuss the use of cannabinoid products with your healthcare providers. These products may interact with other medications or cause side effects that could influence your PD care.
Treat cannabis products as you would any new medication. Always start at a low dose and go up slowly. CBD-only products may also be less likely to cause side effects and could be considered before trying products also containing THC.
For pain in one specific area, consider creams or patches to reduce general side effects.
Be cautious when ingesting edible products, as they can have delayed side effects and increased toxicity.
Consider staying with the same dispensary. Since cannabis products are not regulated, do not assume the “dose” on a label from one dispensary will have the same effects as one obtained from a different dispensary.
Be aware of potential side effects, particularly dizziness, problems with balance, worsening motivation, dry mouth and impaired thinking and memory.
Parkinson’s Foundation Drives Research with New Patient Engagement Framework
The Parkinson’s Foundation makes research more efficient and effective by involving those living with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in the research process. People living with PD are experts because they know this disease, its symptoms and how it impacts their lives. The Parkinson’s Foundation Research Advocacy Program (formerly referred to as Patient Advocates in Research) trains research advocates ― people with Parkinson’s and care partners ― to provide their expertise to researchers in academia, government and pharmaceutical companies. Historically, there has not been a universal process in place to help researchers engage research advocates in their work. The Parkinson’s Foundation is changing that.
What is patient engagement?Patient engagement is when people with Parkinson’s and care partners work alongside scientists to design and run research studies. Patient engagement speeds up research, making it more efficient and effective.
In May 2020, the Parkinson’s Foundation published an article in the scientific journal Health Expectations outlining a patient engagement framework developed from the Foundation’s 12 years of experience working with research advocates. The framework is designed to help researchers integrate and measure patient engagement in their work, ultimately leading to better studies.
“Over the last decade the Parkinson’s Foundation has learned that there is critical information pharmaceutical companies and academia are missing by not involving people living with Parkinson’s in the research process,” said Megan Feeney, author and Parkinson’s Foundation Senior Manager of Community Engagement. “There are also many researchers open to making patient engagement a priority, but we need evidence to promote this practice.”
This framework provides a clear outline for researchers to follow. “The goal of this framework is to make patient engagement a common practice in the research process for all health conditions, whether a researcher has experience working with patients or not,” Megan said. “This patient engagement framework can be customized by any researcher for any study.”
Patient Engagement Leads to Smarter Research
Why is patient engagement important? Without patient input, research may target the wrong outcomes or design trials without consideration of the preferences of people living with Parkinson’s. In one clinical trial, people with Parkinson’s were excited to help test a new PD medication. However, the clinical trial requirements were burdensome. Due to poor recruitment and retention, the trial could not continue. Had the researchers designed a clinical trial allowing for patient engagement, it could have been more patient friendly, while enrolling and retaining study participants. Read the article for more case studies.
“When you design a clinical study with input from people living with Parkinson’s, each part of the study can be tailored for the community you are trying to help without impacting the quality of the science, making research faster and better,” Megan said. The patient engagement framework is now available for all organizations to utilize and tailor to their needs to expedite research and make it relevant to their community.
Parkinson’s and Beyond
Not every organization has a patient engagement process in place, like the Parkinson’s Foundation. Parkinson’s is a complex disease with multiple symptoms (non-movement and movement) that can make the patient engagement process difficult to navigate without the proper planning and resources. The Foundation works to mediate patient engagement so that both people living with Parkinson’s and researchers can contribute and have a positive experience.
“We work with researchers and other patient advocacy organizations all over the world to overcome the challenges that people might experiences when engaging with patients for the first time,” said Karlin Schroeder, co-author and Parkinson’s Foundation Senior Director of Community Engagement. “The ultimate goal is to create an environment for success that helps the most people possible.”
The Parkinson’s Foundation will continue to use its patient engagement framework, helping people with Parkinson’s become empowered to fight this disease through active involvement. “We hope this framework can become a blueprint, reaching beyond Parkinson’s so other patient advocacy groups can utilize this model for other life-impacting diseases and increase patient engagement for the greater good,” Karlin said.
If you are interested in becoming a research advocate or working with research advocates, please email Karlin Schroeder at KSchroeder@Parkinson.org.
Read the full article online “Utilizing Patient Advocates in Parkinson’s Disease: A Proposed Framework for Patient Engagement and the Modern Metrics that Can Determine Its Success in Health Expectations” in Health Expectations.
New Study Examines Impulse Control, REM Sleep and Dopamine
Impulse control behaviors (ICBs) affect between 14% and 40% of people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Examples of ICB’s include compulsive gambling or shopping, hoarding and hyper sexuality. ICBs become impulse control disorders (ICD) when they impair one’s ability to function at work, home and navigate day-to-day life. Only 2% of people have ICBs in the general population.
Why the dramatic disparity? It has to do with the gold standard medication for PD: Dopamine replacement therapy, such as L-dopa, as well as dopamine agonists, such as Requip (ropinirole), Mirapex (pramipexole) and Neupro (rotigotine), are all strongly linked to experiencing ICBs. This is because dopamine, in addition to relaying messages that plan and control body movement, also plays a primary role in the reward pathway in our brains ― in other words, it makes us feel good, even elated.
Since ICBs are commonly experienced as highly pleasurable ― and even anxiety-relieving ― people with ICBs may go to great lengths to hide their compulsions from friends, family and their healthcare professionals. Unfortunately, all too often, this concealment results in detrimental personal and financial consequences. There is a need to better understand the Parkinson’s-ICB connection.
A large, three-year, prospective, multi-center study published in Neurology titled, “Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease and RBD: A longitudinal study of severity” (Baig et al., 2019) sought to address four key questions:
What is the distribution and severity of PD-ICBs?
How does this vary over time?
How common are Parkinson’s ICBs?
Which clinical factors are associated with PD-ICBs?
In this study, otherwise healthy people with ICBs were compared with those who had PD and a REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Why was REM chosen? Previous studies have suggested that the presence of RBDs may infer a higher risk of developing PD-ICD. However, it is not known whether RBD itself, or whether a particular RBD-PD subtype, increases that risk.
There were 932 PD participants in the study. Due to factors such as withdrawal and deaths, 531 completed the study. Those with RBD (and the control arm) were clinically screened for ICBs using the Questionnaire for Impulsivity in Parkinson’s Disease. Those who were ICB-positive were then invited to participate in a semi-structured interview, that was repeated every 18 months. Clinical assessments were performed with a variety of tools to assess a broad range of motor and non-motor symptoms at each visit. Severity of the ICB was assessed with the Parkinson’s Impulse Control Scale, and ICB prevalence and associations were mathematically calculated.
Results
Impulse control behaviors were common in the early stages of PD (19.1% prevalence).
There were no increased risks for having ICBs associated age, sex, cognition, sleep disorders or marital status.
The incidence of depression was higher among participants with PD with ICD than those without.
There was significant variation in the severity (both the impact and intensity) of PD-ICB – fluctuating within a relatively short period of time.
Internal factors (mood and coping mechanisms) impacted the severity of PD-related Impulse control behaviors.
External factors (major life events and social support) also impacted the severity of the PD-ICBs.
What Does This Mean?
This study found that ICBs are common in the early stages of PD, with a larger proportion of this population having symptoms of ICD, but not enough for the behavior to be designated a disorder. While scientists have known for over a decade that dopamine-related drugs could be linked to ICDs in some people with PD, it wasn’t until 2004 that people living with Parkinson’s began to learn that ICDs could be a rare side effect of dopamine agonists.
Thus, dopamine dosage changes may need to be considered, when ICB or ICD behaviors appear to be present. Lastly, people with PD, and their care partners, need to be aware that internal (mood and coping mechanisms) and external factors (major life events and social support) were found to be contributing causes for progressing from an impulse control behavior problem to a disorder.
Learn More
Learn more about Parkinson’s and impulse control issues in the following Parkinson’s Foundation resources or by calling our free Helpline at 1-800-4PD-INFO (473-4636):
Baig, F., Kelly, M. J., Lawton, M. A., Ruffmann, C., Rolinski, M., Klein, J. C., . . . Hu, M. T. (2019). Impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease and RBD: A longitudinal study of severity. Neurology, 93(7), e675-e687. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007942
Barone, D. A., & Henchcliffe, C. (2018). Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and the link to alpha-synucleinopathies. Clin Neurophysiol, 129(8), 1551-1564. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.003
Fantini, M. L., Figorilli, M., Arnulf, I., Zibetti, M., Pereira, B., Beudin, P., . . . Durif, F. (2018). Sleep and REM sleep behaviour disorder in Parkinson's disease with impulse control disorder. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 89(3), 305-310. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-316576
Figorilli, M., Congiu, P., Lecca, R., Gioi, G., Frau, R., & Puligheddu, M. (2018). Sleep in Parkinson's Disease with Impulse Control Disorder. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 18(10), 68. doi:10.1007/s11910-018-0875-x
The goal of PD GENEration is to leverage genetics as a powerful tool to help us uncover what is responsible for slowing or stopping the progression of Parkinson’s, which will ultimately improve care and speed the development of new treatments. Study results will advance how we design clinical trials, for instance, testing a new medication based on what type of PD gene a person carries.
As the first national Parkinson’s study to offer bilingual genetic testing in a clinical setting with counseling, the Parkinson’s Foundation flagship study has unearthed exciting preliminary findings.
Higher Detection Rate
Of the 291 people who have been tested as part of the study, 51 tested positive with a genetic mutation that is linked to PD. This amounts to 17% of all PD GENEration participants.
This percentage is higher than the current reported estimates of one to 10% of people with PD who have a genetic connection to the disease — a range that is not representative of the entire PD population since not everyone with Parkinson’s has been genetically tested. PD GENEration researchers theorize that as more people with PD get genetically tested, the rate of detection will most likely rise.
Discovering Rare Mutations
Genetic test results have led researchers to identify extremely rare genetic mutations linked to PD. Some study participants carry multiple mutations, meaning one person can carry two or three different genetic mutations associated with PD.
These multiple genetic mutation carriers have not been extensively studied — thus, we do not know how living with multiple genetic mutations affects PD symptoms or progression. This finding will significantly contribute to the biological understanding of the disease, helping us assess the impact of each mutation and which ones are more influential towards causing the disease, which will lead to better treatments.
Creating an International PD Panel
PD GENEration is working to finalize the development of a global leadership council on genetics and PD. The international expert PD panel convenes leading clinicians, molecular biologists and geneticists who will develop global consensus to decide which genes and mutations are important for PD and will accelerate research efforts towards better PD treatments.
“This panel welcomes anyone and everyone who is significant in genetics and PD,” said James Beck, PhD, Parkinson’s Foundation Chief Scientific Officer. “It will be a platform for experts from around the world to assess PD GENEration data in real time — data that has already led us to new findings.”
A Community Dedicated to Research
As evidence that the study’s outreach to the PD community goes far beyond the Foundation’s immediate network, 33% of the PD GENEration participants came from outside of the Parkinson’s Foundation Centers of Excellence network. Participants traveled from 21 states to six pilot sites.
“This community is determined and resilient to do what it takes to contribute to Parkinson’s research, a great indication that we will be able to successfully complete our goal of enrolling 15,000 participants who want to know if they have a genetic link to this disease,” Dr. Beck said.
The Next Phase
The PD GENEration study will expand to more testing sites. In response to the current climate, PD GENEration leaders are designing a telemedicine-based approach, where participants can submit their test using an at-home kit and complete virtual, bilingual genetic counseling.
PD GENEration recently partnered with Biogen to accelerate the study. Looking ahead, once PD GENEration is complete, the partnership will help drug development companies, like Biogen and others, recruit for clinical trials faster. This will help speed up the development of better PD medications and recruitment for PD clinical trials.
What Happens in the Vagus Nerve: The PD Gut-Brain Connection
The gut-brain relationship is real. Stomach or intestinal distress can lead to anxiety or depression. However, those gut-brain connections go much further: evidence from recent studies strongly suggest a link between the gut (the gastrointestinal system) and Parkinson’s disease (PD).
In the PD research field, the Braak Hypothesis states that the earliest signs of Parkinson's are found in the enteric nervous system (known as the brain in the gut). This theory is supported by evidence that in PD, non-motor symptoms, such as constipation, may appear before motor symptoms. Braak hypothesized that abnormal alpha-synuclein can spread from the gut via the vagus nerve to the midbrain, where it selectively kills dopamine neurons.
Get to Know the Brain
Alpha-synuclein: a protein found in the brain, central to Parkinson’s.
Central Nervous System:controls most functions of the body and mind. Consists of the brain and the spinal cord.
Prion: a protein that can harm a normal protein, causing damage to healthy brain cells. Some scientists believe alpha-synuclein can become a prion and lead to Lewy body clumps, the hallmark of PD.
Vagus Nerve: a nerve that connects the brain to the gut. Regulates organ functions, such as digestion, heart rate, respiratory rate, coughing, sneezing and swallowing.
Published in Neuron, a 2019 study titled, “Transneuronal Propagation of Pathologic alpha-Synuclein from the Gut to the Brain Models Parkinson's Disease" (Kim et al., 2019) a group of scientists tested Braak’s hypotheses, mimicking the spread of abnormal alpha-synuclein observed in PD, scientists injected both normal mice and knock-out mice (mice with no alpha-synuclein) with misfolded alpha-synuclein directly into the stomach opening and part of the small intestine ― which are packed with vagus nerve branches.
To monitor the injected abnormal alpha-synuclein, scientists used a stain to observe the progression, if any, from the gut to the brain over several months. They also tested severing the vagus nerve in the mice, to see whether it might prevent the spread of the abnormal alpha-synuclein to the brain. Additionally, throughout the study, several tests were conducted on the mice to measure motor and non-motor symptoms.
Results In normal mice:
Injecting abnormal alpha-synuclein into the gut did get taken by the vagus nerve and successfully traveled into the brain, causing the normal alpha-synuclein to transform into abnormal, misfolded alpha-synuclein.
This transformation process traveled from cell-to-cell, forming more Lewy body clumps. Remember, misfolded alpha-synuclein is the main component of Lewy bodies.
Injecting abnormal alpha-synuclein into their gut resulted in significant dopamine loss.
In the mice with no alpha-synuclein:
Injecting abnormal alpha-synuclein into their gut successfully made it into the brain, but nothing happened. Since there was no normal alpha-synuclein, it was not able to start the clumping.
Motor and Non-Motor Findings
Seven months after injecting abnormal alpha-synuclein into the gut of normal mice:
There was a significant loss of dopamine in the brain.
There were non-motor cognitive impairments, including memory and social deficits, anxiety, depression and olfactory and gastrointestinal dysfunction.
Motor deficits included a loss of grip strength and agility.
Those mice that had their vagus nerve severed prevented the loss of grip strength and agility shortfalls.
What Does This Mean?
The major findings of this study support that abnormal alpha-synuclein is capable of spreading from the gastrointestinal tract (the gut) through the vagus nerve into the brain, leading to a loss of dopamine.
Further, the Kim et al. (2019) study also revealed that the misfolded alpha-synuclein in the brain causes the normal alpha-synuclein to misfold; and those misfolds form into clumps, resulting in Lewy bodies, which in turn, result in Parkinsonian symptoms. In terms of potential therapeutic applications, if this gut-brain PD connection via the vagus nerve works the same way in people, it may be possible to interfere with this trafficking to prevent PD symptom progression before it reaches the brain.
Learn More
The Parkinson’s Foundation believes in empowering the Parkinson’s community through education. Learn more about the Parkinson’s and LID in the below Parkinson’s Foundation resources or by calling our free Helpline at 1-800-4PD-INFO (473-4636).
Braak, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2017). Neuropathological Staging of Brain Pathology in Sporadic Parkinson's disease: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff. J Parkinsons Dis, 7(s1), S71-S85. doi:10.3233/JPD-179001
Braak, H., Ghebremedhin, E., Rub, U., Bratzke, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2004). Stages in the development of Parkinson's disease-related pathology. Cell Tissue Res, 318(1), 121-134. doi:10.1007/s00441-004-0956-9
Braak, H., Rub, U., Gai, W. P., & Del Tredici, K. (2003). Idiopathic Parkinson's disease: possible routes by which vulnerable neuronal types may be subject to neuroinvasion by an unknown pathogen. J Neural Transm (Vienna), 110(5), 517-536. doi:10.1007/s00702-002-0808-2
Breit, S., Kupferberg, A., Rogler, G., & Hasler, G. (2018). Vagus Nerve as Modulator of the Brain-Gut Axis in Psychiatric and Inflammatory Disorders. Front Psychiatry, 9, 44. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044
Caputi, V., & Giron, M. C. (2018). Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis and Toll-Like Receptors in Parkinson's Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 19(6). doi:10.3390/ijms19061689
Kim, S., Kwon, S. H., Kam, T. I., Panicker, N., Karuppagounder, S. S., Lee, S., . . . Ko, H. S. (2019). Transneuronal Propagation of Pathologic alpha-Synuclein from the Gut to the Brain Models Parkinson's Disease. Neuron, 103(4), 627-641 e627. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.035
Miraglia, F., & Colla, E. (2019). Microbiome, Parkinson's Disease and Molecular Mimicry. Cells, 8(3). doi:10.3390/cells8030222
Mulak, A., & Bonaz, B. (2015). Brain-gut-microbiota axis in Parkinson's disease. World J Gastroenterol, 21(37), 10609-10620. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10609
Rick van der Vliet, PhD, MD, of Erasmus University Medical Center, received a Parkinson’s Foundation GeorgeG. KaufmanImpactAwardto study a new way to diagnose Parkinson’s disease in an early stage, initiate treatment earlier, and monitor disease progression.
Degeneration in the region in the brain called the substantia nigra is a key mechanism underlying progression of Parkinson’s, but it is hard to measure reliably. Substantia nigra degeneration starts years before a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s.
Dr. van der Vliet will focus on DNA fragments called small cell-free DNA fragments (cfDNA), developing a targeted test to measure them in blood samples. This will serve as a marker of substantia nigra degeneration. This study will then determine whether the test results reflect the progression of Parkinson’s.
“I think that a biomarker (an indicator of disease activity) for Parkinson's disease is essential for the development of new drugs,” said Dr. van der Vliet. “A biomarker can help select patients for therapy even before symptoms start and monitor treatment effects in clinical trials. We hope to develop this biomarker by measuring DNA circulating in the blood stream after being released from damaged brain areas.”
When asked about the impact of this grant on his research career, Dr. van der Vliet said, “As a starting scientist, it is definitely competitive to get your first funding for new research ideas. And without funding, it's difficult to get more convincing data to show your idea actually works. Receiving this grant therefore feels like an essential steppingstone towards the development of our biomarker for Parkinson's and other neurological diseases."
Midbrain Region May Play Underappreciated Role in Parkinson’s
Juan Mena-Segovia, MD, PhD, of Rutgers University received a Parkinson’s Foundation GeorgeG. KaufmanImpactAwardto study the involvement of a specific brain region called the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). This area of the brain has a likely, although unclear, role in gait control, in Parkinson’s disease (PD). This may open new avenues for novel therapeutic approaches during a critical period early in the disease.
Brain areas that control movement undergo a series of changes in Parkinson’s that are not fully understood. It is well known that damage in brain neurons (nerve cells) that produce the chemical dopamine occurs in Parkinson’s. Similar to dopamine neurons, the PPN also undergoes damage in Parkinson’s. Some of its neurons are believed to die during the course of the disease. Researchers have focused on the PPN as a potential target for novel therapies aimed at relieving symptoms such as freezing-of-gait or abnormal posture.
Emerging evidence, however, offers alternative explanations for the nature of the involvement of PPN neurons in Parkinson’s. A recent study revealed that PPN neurons that were believed to be missing may be able to change their identity.
Dr. Mena-Segovia’s lab found that by activating the inhibitory neurons of the PPN that connect with dopamine neurons, they can reproduce symptoms of Parkinson’s, including difficulty in starting or continuing to walk. The findings suggest that the inhibitory signals arising in the PPN may play a role in the activity of dopamine neurons during Parkinson’s.
This research will significantly advance our understanding of dopamine neurons in Parkinson’s.
Wassim Elyaman, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center, received a Parkinson’s Foundation GeorgeG.KaufmanImpactAward to explore the role of the immune system in the development and progression of Parkinson’s disease (PD).
Researchers believe the immune system can play a key role in Parkinson’s. However, most of the immune processes that are potentially involved in Parkinson’s are poorly understood.
Research suggests that the immune system’s ability to mount a controlled response to a specific antigen (foreign body or toxic substance) is impaired in Parkinson’s. Using cutting-edge techniques, Dr. Elyaman will look at antigen-specific immune responses occurring in the brains of people with Parkinson’s.
Studies of the brains of people who died with Parkinson’s show an infiltration of immune cells called T cells in a region of the brain thought to be protected from immune cells. This suggests that Parkinson’s might have an autoimmune or infectious component. Dr. Elyaman’s research seeks to answer key questions about the immune response in the central nervous system of people with Parkinson’s. This study may lay the groundwork for new treatment approaches.
“Recent studies pointed to a critical role of the immune system in attacking neurons in Parkinson's,” said Dr. Elyaman. “This Parkinson’s Foundation award is a high risk, high reward research program that may open a new field that leverages existing immune-based therapeutics to treat Parkinson's disease.”