Raise Awareness

Disease Modification & Stem Cells: Where Are We Now?

🧠 What will you learn in this article?

Learn more about ongoing Parkinson’s disease research that setting the foundation for new treatments. Highlights include: 

  • Researchers are developing biomarkers and biological measures to detect Parkinson’s earlier, monitor progression and evaluate whether treatments work.
  • Genetics research can inform people of their genetic tie to Parkinson’s and helps connect them with targeted clinical trials and personalized therapies.
  • Emerging treatments include stem cell replacement of dopamine-producing neurons, alpha-synuclein therapies, gut-brain interventions, focused ultrasound and more.
  • Experimental treatments require caution: never pay to take part in a clinical trial.
female scientist viewing a slide under a microscope in lab setting

Researchers are finding new ways to measure how Parkinson’s disease (PD) progresses and how well promising treatments work. These discoveries could help make way for disease-modifying therapies; interventions that may slow, stop or possibly reverse brain changes in Parkinson’s. Learn more about research breakthroughs and where to exercise caution.

This article is based on an Expert Briefing hosted by movement disorders specialist and Parkinson’s Foundation National Medical Advisor, Michael S Okun, MD, director of the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, a Parkinson’s Foundation Center of Excellence.

Discoveries Driving Disease-Modifying Research: Biomarkers, Genetics and More

Parkinson’s is a progressive brain disease that scientists believe involves a mix of environmental and genetic factors. Researchers are beginning to uncover those complex connections and better understand the diversity of the disease as people with Parkinson’s have different genetic ties to PD, symptoms and rate of progression.

Parkinson’s can begin developing sometimes a decade or more before visible symptoms appear. This quiet evolution has historically made it difficult to test therapies early in the course of disease. Researchers were often unable to enroll people in testing for potential therapies until they had developed the movement symptoms used to diagnose Parkinson’s or learned they had a genetic link. 

Research advances are helping scientists uncover who may be at risk, measure disease biology and test therapies in more targeted ways, including:

Biomarkers: The discovery of biomarkers in PD, substances in the body that provide clues about health, is changing the field. Diagnosis still relies on neurological exams, symptom history and response to dopamine therapies, but key PD biomarker tests can support a diagnosis. Researchers are working toward defining Parkinson’s by biology rather than symptoms. Biomarkers could help diagnose PD earlier, track disease progression and show whether treatments are working.

Focusing on alpha-synuclein: Clumps of misfolded alpha-synuclein proteins are linked to brain changes in Parkinson’s. Researchers are exploring ways to reduce alpha-synuclein production, prevent it from misfolding and clumping or to stop its spread.

Genetic studies: Groundbreaking research, such as PD GENEration: Powered by the Parkinson’s Foundation, is having a tremendous impact in detecting genetic variants linked to Parkinson’s. This work is helping people access clinical trials earlier and driving the development of personalized treatments. 

Thanks to the more than 35,000 people who have already joined PD GENEration, the Parkinson’s Foundation has learned that around 13% of people have a Parkinson’s related genetic variant, a big increase from earlier research estimates of 5 to 10%. The ever-growing study is continuing to propel new discoveries.

Active clinical trials that test new therapies are targeting genetic variants identified through PD GENEration testing, such as LRRK2. Clinical studies for therapies targeting a mutated GBA gene, one of the most common genetic risk factors for Parkinson’s, are also underway. 

Stem cell therapies: Research are exploring the potential of using tissue cells that can be transformed into dopamine neurons to address dopamine loss in Parkinson’s. Stem cell studies suggest that this approach may one day help improve PD symptoms. 

Some promising stem cell studies are moving closer to Phase 3 clinical trials, often one of the last steps before a drug manufacturer seeks approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Other research areas to watch include:

  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. These and similar therapies, initially targeted at weight loss and type 2 diabetes, are being explored for the potential to improve Parkinson’s symptoms.
  • Studies exploring the gut-brain connection in PD. Scientists have discovered that Lewy bodies (clumps of misfolded alpha-synuclein proteins linked to brain disruption in Parkinson’s) can also be found in the gastrointestinal tract of people living with PD. Dietary interventions to alter gut bacteria and change the course of Parkinson’s may be on the horizon.
  • Focused ultrasound is an advanced PD treatment that may lessen motor fluctuations when medications are no longer effective. Low-intensity focused ultrasound, an emerging technique, is being explored to temporarily open the blood-brain barrier to deliver targeted PD trial treatments directly to the brain.
  • Scientists are exploring whether a gene-editing tool called CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) could address PD-related genetic targets.

Exercising Caution

Though hopeful progress is happening in disease-modifying therapies and stem cell research for Parkinson’s, legitimate trials are critical. Dubious and sometimes dangerous offerings have been shut down by the FDA and regulatory agencies all over the world. 

Stem cell tourism, travel to places with little medical or scientific regulation for unverified treatments, can put people at serious health and financial risk.

⚠️Be careful with any trials or experimental treatments that make big promises, skip over risks or ask for payment. Clinical trials do not charge people to take part.  

If you are considering a trial, be sure to ask questions about study protocols and talk with your healthcare team to determine whether it feels like the right fit. These websites can help you learn more about clinical trials for Parkinson’s:

  • Join A Study — a Parkinson’s Foundation webpage that lists ongoing PD research studies.
  • ClinicalTrials.Gov — a public database with active and completed clinical studies in the U.S. and around the world.

Learn More

Building the foundation for a cure is at the heart of the Parkinson's Foundation mission:

My PD Story

Nora Bengoa-Vergniory
Researchers

Nora Bengoa-Vergniory, PhD

2026 Impact Award

Trying to Slow Parkinson’s by Targeting a New Type of Cell in the Brain

In Parkinson’s disease (PD), dopamine neurons in the brain break down over time, leading to progressively worsening symptoms. Most of these neurons affected by PD are found in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) region of the brain. However, neurons are not the only type of brain cell in this region, leading researchers to wonder if other types of brain cells may play a role in PD progression.

Nora Bengoa-Vergniory, PhD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Impact Award, will investigate if oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) could be an important go-between of PD progression in the brain. Previous research in her lab has shown that these OPCs become impaired by alpha-synuclein tangles, much like the surrounding dopamine neurons. Data suggest that OPCs could be functioning like a bridge for PD, helping to spread the tangles from one neuron to the next. If so, targeting them in new therapies could help slow PD progression.

Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory, from her lab at the Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience in Biscay, Spain, will test if a type of drug called PDGFRα inhibitors, which targets and shuts down cells like OPCs, can reduce the spread of alpha-synuclein tangles. By using OPCs and lab-grown neurons, she can quickly and efficiently observe how such treatment could be effective in the human brain.

“By defining the role of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) in Parkinson's and evaluating PDGFRα as a potential therapeutic target, this research has the potential to reveal new avenues for intervention.” – Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory

After finding which PDGFRα inhibitor is most effective at blocking OPCs, Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory will then see if such a treatment is able to reduce the spread of alpha-synuclein in mouse brains. This experiment will be performed alongside similar mice tests to confirm if OPCs play a causal role in alpha-synuclein spread from neuron to neuron.

Nora seated at a computer workstation in a research lab.

Through this work, Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory will uncover how an understudied group of cells contribute to disease progression, with the hope of advancing PDGFRα as a druggable treatment target for PD.

“Despite Parkinson's being first described over two centuries ago, the contribution of OPCs has remained largely unexplored,” said Dr. Bengoa-Vergniory. “This funding will be crucial to enable my laboratory to address this critical gap in knowledge, contributing to the development of disease-modifying therapies that slow or halt disease progression.”

Meet more Parkinson’s researchers! Explore our My PD Stories featuring PD researchers.

My PD Story

Zachary Freyberg headshot
Researchers

Zachary Freyberg, MD, PhD

2026 Environmental Trigger Award

Using Toxin Exposures to Find Genes that Protect Neurons from Parkinson’s

In Parkinson’s disease (PD), dopamine neurons in the brain break down over time. This leads to the progressive and worsening symptoms seen in people with PD. However, scientists have observed that some dopamine neurons in the brain are naturally more resilient than others, staying functional while other similar neurons fall apart.

Zachary Freyberg, MD, PhD, a recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Environmental Trigger Award, is looking for the genetic reasons why some neurons are more resistant to PD than others. In doing so, he hopes to discover new ways to spread such resilience throughout the brain and protect against the disease.

From his research lab at the University of Pittsburgh, Dr. Freyberg is tackling this question from a highly relevant angle: by observing which dopamine neurons survive following exposure to PD-related toxins. His team has already found two genes in animal models that seem to be associated with neuron resilience: NDUFB1 and ULK1. These genes were more active in neurons that stayed healthy when exposed to pesticides linked to PD. When Dr. Freyberg and his research team turned off those genes, the neurons became vulnerable again, signaling their protective importance.

“By identifying and testing the genes and cellular structures that protect human dopamine neurons, this work may uncover new therapeutic targets and biomarkers for neuroprotection.” – Dr. Freyberg

Now, Dr. Freyberg will determine if NDUFB1 and ULK1 are also important for neuron protection against PD in humans. First, he will grow human dopamine neuron cells in a lab, modifying some samples to overexpress these two genes. After exposing these neurons to PD-related toxins, Dr. Freyberg will observe whether the neurons with more active NDUFB1 and ULK1 resist degeneration better than the unchanged neurons. 

Zachary sitting beside a microscope in a research lab.

He will also use a technology called cryo-electron tomography to perform microscopic CT scans of the neurons. This will let his team visualize how the biological machinery in the cells like mitochondria are affected by toxins with and without the protection of NDUFB1 and ULK1.

Lastly, Dr. Freyberg will analyze donated brain tissue from people with and without PD to see how NDUFB1 and ULK1 levels associate with healthy and disease-affected neurons. He hypothesizes that they will see higher levels of activity from those genes in the remaining dopamine neurons of PD-affected brains.

If Dr. Freyberg and his team find that NDUFB1 and ULK1 help protect dopamine neurons in humans, this research could open the door for new treatments that fight PD progression. 

“To be chosen and supported by the Parkinson's Foundation is deeply meaningful to me,” said Dr. Freyberg. “This award could lay the groundwork for therapies designed to slow, or even halt, the loss of dopamine neurons that drives Parkinson's disease.”

Meet more Parkinson’s researchers! Explore our My PD Stories featuring PD researchers.

My PD Story

Ethan Brown headshot
Researchers

Ethan Brown, MD

2026 Environmental Trigger Award

Searching for Parkinson’s Risks in Early Childhood Exposures 

Research suggests that many Parkinson’s disease (PD) cases are likely caused by environmental factors. One of the greatest theorized environmental risk factors is exposure to toxicants in the form of certain pesticides, solvents, metals and other pollutants. These exposures could happen before the appearance of PD symptoms by decades and may even take place during childhood. However, despite strong scientific evidence in animal studies, the association between early-life toxicant exposures and PD later in life has been difficult to confirm in humans.

Ethan Brown, MD, recipient of a Parkinson’s Foundation Trailblazer Award, is striving to more firmly link early toxicant exposure to PD in humans. From his research center at the University of California, San Francisco, Dr. Brown will be analyzing data from the Child Health and Development Studies (CHDS) cohort, a clinical study group of nearly 30,000 mothers and fathers. Enrolled in the early 1960s, these participants provided years of information about their habits, behaviors and home setting to help researchers look for links between environmental exposures and effects on their children’s development. Scientists were also able to collect blood samples of pregnant mothers to look for hidden chemical exposures that may impact the developing child. 

The children of these CHDS parents are now at an age where PD diagnosis is increasingly common, around 65 years old. Using the CHDS cohort, Dr. Brown can search for any exposure patterns from childhood that are consistent among those who have developed PD. Identifying these common factors could help scientists build tools to better assess PD risk in adults based on their childhood environment, improving our ability to catch the disease earlier.

“Identifying early-life risk factors for Parkinson’s could expand our understanding of how the disease develops and open new opportunities for prevention decades before symptoms appear.” – Dr. Brown

Dr. Brown will also evaluate data from the parents themselves, assessing who developed PD and if their reported exposures or habits were associated with the disease. Analyzing the maternal blood samples for evidence of toxicant exposure will also provide valuable insights into what chemicals may have increased PD risk for not only the mother, but the child as well. 

Establishing strong data-driven associations between PD and environmental exposures could drive the development of new tests to better understand people’s risk for the disease and attempt to diagnose it sooner. These insights could also help inform the public of the dangers of certain exposures, shaping public policy to reduce PD risk for everyone. 

“Receiving the Parkinson's Foundation Trailblazer Award is a tremendous honor and exciting milestone in my career as a Parkinson's disease researcher,” said Dr. Brown. “The findings from this study could also help guide future research aimed at developing earlier and more effective treatments.”

Meet more Parkinson’s researchers! Explore our My PD Stories featuring PD researchers.

Advancing Research

The "Golden Year" in Parkinson’s: Why Early Clinical Trial Participation Matters

🧠 What will you learn in this article?

This article highlights how the first year after a Parkinson’s diagnosis can be a valuable window for clinical trial participation.

  • The “golden year” refers to the first 12 months after a Parkinson’s  diagnosis, when symptoms may be mild and medication may not yet be needed.
  • Before beginning PD medications, researchers can observe a person’s natural baseline and test treatments that may slow or stop PD progression.
  • Greater awareness and early conversations with care team members can help newly diagnosed people join clinical trials sooner.
A female patient talking with her doctor who is holding a tablet.

After a Parkinson’s diagnosis, many people start their journey by learning about treatments to help ensure their best quality of life. But according to experts like Robert Hauser, MD, from the University of South Florida, a Parkinson’s Foundation Center of Excellence, the initial months after a diagnosis also hold a unique window of opportunity that may go unnoticed by people newly diagnosed with Parkinson’s and their care team. 

In Episode 108 of the Parkinson’s Foundation podcast Substantial Matters: Life & Science of Parkinson's, Dr. Hauser discusses the "golden year," a time prior to starting Parkinson’s medications. This window may hold a key to finding therapies that could change the course of PD. 

What is the “Golden Year”?

The "golden year" refers to the period of about 12 months after diagnosis when a person is more likely to have mild movement symptoms and may not yet need Parkinson’s medications to manage activities of daily life. 

Before starting medications to manage Parkinson’s symptoms, the brain is at its natural baseline. People who have not started medications are sometimes called treatment naïve. Being treatment naïve gives researchers a window to test disease-modifying therapies — treatments designed to slow, halt or possibly reverse Parkinson's progression. 

Timing Matters

Current Parkinson's medications manage movement symptoms such as stiffness and slowness of movement. However, they do not treat symptoms that may appear after many years, such as cognitive changes or serious balance issues. An important need in Parkinson's research is finding a way to diagnose the disease as early as possible and halt its progression before these long-term symptoms arise. 

For a clinical trial to test how a new treatment works, researchers must track changes in a person’s PD over time. Entering a trial before daily medication becomes necessary gives researchers the clearest picture of how well the new treatment works. This makes the "golden year" a unique opportunity for both researchers and people with PD.

Despite the importance of trials in the first year after a Parkinson’s diagnosis, finding eligible participants is a hurdle. It remains a challenge because of these factors: 

  • Starting medication: Neurologists often start people with PD on medications right away, making treatment-free baseline observations unavailable.
  • Wait times: Delays in scheduling appointments with movement disorder specialists can cause newly diagnosed people to miss early trial eligibility. 
  • Awareness: Many health care professionals are unaware of clinical trials for newly diagnosed and treatment naïve people — or how important the golden year is to Parkinson’s research — and do not share trial information with people with PD.

What can we do?

To make the most of this critical time, collaboration is needed between people with Parkinson’s and their care teams:

  • People with Parkinson’s and families: If you or a loved one is newly diagnosed and do not feel an immediate need for medication to manage daily activities, ask your PD doctor about clinical trial opportunities for treatment-naïve individuals.
  • Healthcare providers: Doctors and care teams should discuss clinical trials with their newly diagnosed patients before prescribing PD medications. If symptoms are mild and manageable, allowing time to consider a trial can open doors to groundbreaking research. 
  • Improving access: Some medical centers are working to improve systems to get newly diagnosed people into appointments quickly, so they can explore trial options before starting standard treatment. 

What’s Next

Every approved Parkinson’s treatment exists today because people chose to voluntarily participate in clinical research in the past. Raising awareness about research options helps to ensure newly diagnosed people know what's available and to decide if research participation is the right choice for them. 

Whether you are newly diagnosed or familiar with Parkinson’s, explore opportunities to get involved with PD research today. Explore current studies now.

Videos & Webinars

Expert Briefing: Disease Modification & Stem Cells: Where Are We Now?

September 9, 2026

Now, more studies than ever are exploring disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that could truly change the future of Parkinson’s. While today’s treatments can help with symptoms, we cannot yet alter the disease progression. Researchers are working on DMTs that aim to slow, stop, or reverse the brain changes in Parkinson’s. 

This session will provide an overview of where the field stands—exploring breakthroughs in cell replacement therapies, disease-modifying trials, and ethical considerations. Attendees will learn how researchers are working toward interventions that could slow, stop, or reverse the disease process. 

Download Slides

Webinar Summary

Additional Resources

Presenter

Michael S Okun, MD
Director, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases
A Parkinson's Foundation Center of Excellence

My PD Story

Edwin Castillo headshot
People with PD

Edwin Castillo

How Genetic Testing Gave Me Confidence to Move Forward with Deep Brain Stimulation

When you live with Parkinson's disease (PD), every treatment decision feels significant. You weigh the benefits, risks and uncertainty of what the future may hold. For me, one of the biggest decisions was whether to pursue Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), specifically targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN).

Like many people considering DBS, I spent countless hours researching. One topic that kept appearing was the relationship between the gene mutation linked to PD called GBA1 and cognitive decline after DBS. What I learned through genetic testing ultimately gave me greater confidence in moving forward with surgery.

What Is the GBA1 Gene?

Certain mutations of the GBA1 gene are the most common genetic risk factor for Parkinson's. Research has shown that people with Parkinson's who carry a GBA1 mutation may experience a faster progression of cognitive symptoms and may have a higher risk of developing dementia over time. 

In recent years, researchers have also explored how GBA1 mutations might influence outcomes after DBS. Studies have found that while people with GBA-associated Parkinson's generally experience excellent motor improvement from DBS, some may face a higher risk of cognitive and neuropsychiatric decline compared with non-carriers. 

The Value of Knowing More

One of the challenges of living with Parkinson's is uncertainty. We often hear statistics and probabilities, but those numbers can feel very impersonal.

Edwin and his wife

Deep Brain Stimulation is a surgical treatment used to help control PD movement symptoms, including tremor, stiffness, slowness of movement and medication fluctuations. For many, DBS can significantly improve quality of life and reduce dependence on medications. However, like any treatment, I had to weigh the potential risks and benefits of DBS. 

When I learned about the possible relationship between GBA1 mutations and cognitive outcomes after DBS, I naturally wondered: Do I have this genetic risk factor?

That question led me to PD GENEration.

How PD GENEration Helped Me

PD GENEration is a Parkinson's Foundation study that offers genetic testing and genetic counseling for people living with Parkinson's. The program helps people understand whether they carry genetic variants associated with Parkinson's. As a participant I underwent genetic testing and learned that I do not carry a GBA1 mutation.

That single piece of information did not eliminate all risks associated with DBS. No medical procedure is risk-free, and every person's Parkinson's journey is unique.

However, knowing that I was not a GBA1 carrier removed a significant concern that had been weighing on my mind. Based on current research, the increased cognitive risk observed in GBA1 mutation carriers was not a factor in my personal situation. 

Rather than making the decision for me, the genetic information helped me make a more informed decision.

Knowledge Replaces Fear

One of the most powerful aspects of genetic testing is that it can replace uncertainty with knowledge. Before receiving my results, I found myself asking:

  • Am I at higher risk for cognitive decline after DBS?
  • Should I reconsider surgery?
  • Am I missing important information that could affect my future?

After receiving my PD GENEration results, I had greater clarity. While I still needed to evaluate all the other factors involved in DBS, I felt more confident discussing treatment options with my neurologist and DBS team.

The information didn't guarantee a particular outcome. But it did provide something equally valuable: peace of mind.

Personalized Medicine in Action

One of the exciting developments in Parkinson's care is the move toward personalized medicine. Instead of treating every patient exactly the same, clinicians can increasingly use genetic, clinical and cognitive information to help guide treatment decisions.

Research suggests that genetic information, including GBA1 status, may help patients and physicians have more informed conversations about DBS, expectations, and long-term planning. 

For me, PD GENEration was an example of personalized medicine at work.

My Advice to Others Living with Parkinson's

If you are considering DBS, learn as much as possible, ask questions and have open conversations with your healthcare team.

Genetic testing may not be necessary for everyone, and it may not change every treatment decision. But for me, understanding my genetic profile helped remove some uncertainty from a major life decision.

Today, I view my PD GENEration results as one of the factors that helped me move forward with confidence. I did not learn that I was "risk-free." What I learned was that one important genetic concern, the GBA1 mutation, was not part of my Parkinson's story.

Sometimes knowledge doesn't change the destination. It simply makes the path forward a little clearer.

And when you're facing a decision as significant as DBS, that clarity can make all the difference.

Read Edwin's story in Spanish

Policy & Advocacy

Six Priorities for the National Plan to End Parkinson’s: What We Heard From the Parkinson’s Community

🧠 What will you learn in this article?

  • What nearly 900 Parkinson’s advocates told us should be prioritized in the National Plan to End Parkinson’s. 
  • The six priorities guiding Parkinson’s Foundation recommendations to federal leaders. 
  • How the Parkinson’s Foundation is bringing those priorities directly to the federal Advisory Council. 
  • How you can stay involved as the National Plan is developed. 
cropped image of an older lady filling out a survey

When federal leaders developing the National Plan to End Parkinson’s met for the second time on August 24, the Parkinson’s Foundation brought a clear message from our community: accelerate the breakthroughs that can change Parkinson’s tomorrow while making sure people can access the care they need today.

Ahead of the meeting, we asked advocates what they want federal leaders to prioritize. Nearly 900 people responded, and their input helped inform both the Foundation’s recommendations to the federal government and remarks delivered by Parkinson’s Foundation President and CEO John Lehr to the Advisory Council.

National Plan to End Parkinson's 2026 Survey Findings

What We Heard from the Parkinson’s Community

Research that can fundamentally change the course of Parkinson’s was the clearest priority. Of the 873 survey responses, 94% identified developing treatments that can slow, stop, cure or prevent Parkinson’s as a top research priority. 

Access to care was another major concern: 36% of respondents reported difficulty finding a healthcare provider with Parkinson’s expertise or getting an appointment within a reasonable amount of time. Among respondents in rural communities, that number climbed to 46%. Another 17% reported trouble getting insurance or Medicare to cover recommended Parkinson’s care. 

Six Priorities for the National Plan

The survey findings reinforce the six high-impact goals that guided the Parkinson’s Foundation recommendations to the federal government through its Request for Information on the National Plan.

In partnership with the American Parkinson Disease Association and The Michael J. Fox Foundation, we outlined six priorities for what the National Plan should achieve by 2035: 

  1. Reduce the financial impact of Parkinson’s on families living with the disease. 
  2. Improve health outcomes and quality of life for people with Parkinson’s. 
  3. Prevent Parkinson’s, improve symptoms and slow or stop disease progression. 
  4. Improve the quality of care for people with Parkinson’s covered through federally funded healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. 
  5. Research the association between environmental triggers and Parkinson’s and reduce exposure to potential risks. 
  6. Research and better understand the underlying factors contributing to Parkinson’s. 

Together, these priorities reflect both the long-term goal of preventing and curing Parkinson’s and the immediate need to improve care, affordability and quality of life for people living with the disease today.

Bringing Priorities to Federal Leaders

John Lehr brought these priorities directly to the Advisory Council during its August 24 meeting.

“The National Plan should provide the leadership and accountability necessary to turn these priorities into measurable progress for people with Parkinson’s and their families,” John said.

The Parkinson’s Foundation is also urging the Advisory Council to keep implementation of the National Parkinson’s Project on track, including delivering its first annual report within a year.

The work is far from over. Two more public Advisory Council meetings are planned for November 9 and December 7, giving people affected by Parkinson’s additional opportunities to weigh in as the National Plan takes shape.

After years of advocacy to create this historic federal initiative, the Parkinson’s community now has an opportunity to help determine what it delivers.

Stay involved. Join our Advocacy Network to receive updates about opportunities to make your voice heard and help us push for a National Plan that meets the needs of people with Parkinson’s and their families.

Podcasts

Episode 194: Empowering the Next Generation of Parkinson’s Advocates

You don’t have to have Parkinson’s disease (PD), or even know someone who does, to help make a difference. Although you may not personally know someone living with Parkinson’s, nearly 90,000 people are diagnosed each year. Having a basic understanding of the disease and how it can present is critical to raising awareness and helping people recognize the signs of PD in themselves or someone they know. Earlier diagnosis can lead to timely treatment, better health outcomes, and an improved quality of life.

Parkinson’s has long been viewed as an “old man’s disease,” creating the misconception that it only affects older adults. In this episode, Bryan Geenen and Prajakti Barot, Parkinson’s Foundation Ambassadors in Colorado, share why they chose to become volunteers and how they’re helping challenge that stereotype. They discuss why younger generations play a vital role in raising awareness, bringing fresh perspectives, and inspiring others to take action.

Key Takeaways:

  • As more people are diagnosed with Parkinson’s each year, younger generations have an opportunity to bring fresh ideas and technology to build on past work.
  • Knowing the common signs of PD helps educate others about the disease. 
  • You don’t have to know someone with PD to make a positive impact on the Parkinson’s community.

Released: September 15, 2026

Science News

Study Finds 5 Subtle Walking Changes That Show Up Before a Parkinson's Diagnosis

🧠 What will you learn in this article?

This article highlights a new study published in Journal of Neural Transmission that found subtle changes in how people walk in everyday life that may help detect Parkinson’s years before a diagnosis. Highlights include:

  • Study participants wore a wrist-worn motion sensor for seven days and were followed for up to 10 years through their medical records. 
  • Comparing people who were later diagnosed with Parkinson’s to those who were not, five walking measures stood out, all detectable years before a diagnosis.
  • Changes in arm movement were detectable the earliest — up to 6.8 years before diagnosis. 
  • Growing evidence, like this study, suggests that Parkinson’s leaves detectable traces years before diagnosis and when traditional symptoms appear.
Parkinson's Foundation Science News blogs

By the time most people are diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease (PD), the condition has most likely been developing quietly, undetected, for years. This early period — before the typical tremors, stiffness and slowness that lead to a diagnosis become obvious — is known as the prodromal phase. Finding ways to detect Parkinson’s during this window is a major goal of research, because earlier identification could improve outcomes through earlier treatment and better care. 

Researchers are working to find biomarkers that could detect PD early. In addition to lab tests, wearable technology may monitor daily activity and detect subtle clues of disease. These “digital gait biomarkers,” may provide a simple, accessible way to detect early signs of Parkinson’s.  

A new study published in the Journal of Neural Transmission suggests that subtle changes in how people walk in everyday life may be detectable up to nearly seven years before a Parkinson’s diagnosis — and that an ordinary wrist-worn device, similar to a fitness tracker, may be able to detect those changes. 

Study Results

Researchers at the University of New South Wales in Australia analyzed data from more than 73,000 participants in the UK Biobank, a large long-term health study. Between 2013 and 2015, each participant wore a wrist accelerometer (a motion sensor) for seven days, and was then followed for up to 10 years through their medical records. During that time, 314 people were diagnosed with Parkinson’s.

The researchers used software called Watch Walk to translate raw motion data into 17 detailed measures of walking — not just step counting, but the quality and structure of movement: walking speed, step rhythm, how long they walked continuously and how their hands and arms moved.

Researchers then compared people later diagnosed with Parkinson’s with those who were not. People who developed Parkinson's had five measures that stood out consistently years before diagnosis. They:

  1. Took fewer daily steps. They took substantially fewer steps per day, and the gap grew wider as their diagnosis approached.
  2. Had slower top walking speed. Their fastest walking pace was slower, suggesting a reduced ability to speed up when needed.
  3. Had reduced arm movement. They spent more time walking with their arms held still — for example, hands held in front of the body — and less time with a natural arm swing. Reduced arm swing is an early sign of Parkinson’s.
  4. Showed changes in step rhythm. Their step patterns were, somewhat unexpectedly, more uniform — which the researchers suggest may reflect a loss of natural flexibility in how healthy people adjust their walking.
  5. Displayed differences in walking patterns. The way their walking was broken up over the day — into shorter versus longer continuous stretches — also differed from those who did not develop Parkinson’s.

Of these, changes in arm movement were detectable the earliest — up to 6.8 years before diagnosis. The drop in daily steps was especially pronounced in the years closest to diagnosis.

Highlights

  • Researchers analyzed one week of wrist-sensor data of everyday living from more than 73,000 people, then tracked who developed Parkinson’s over the following decade.
  • Five walking measures consistently distinguished people who later developed Parkinson’s: fewer daily steps, slower top walking speed, reduced arm movement, altered step rhythm, and differences in walking patterns.
  • Changes in arm movement were detectable the earliest, up to 6.8 years before diagnosis.
  • Results show that digital gait biomarkers of everyday movement can potentially identify subtle signs of Parkinson’s years before diagnosis. 
  • The findings describe group-level patterns, not an individual diagnostic test, and will need to be confirmed in future studies.

Why is This Study Important?

Parkinson’s affects the brain circuits that control movement, so in practice, walking — a complex, coordinated activity — would show early signs of change. Postural instability, or difficulty balancing is one of the most challenging PD movement symptoms. Importantly, the technology from wearable sensors can break down the complex aspects of walking into components that can be analyzed separately.

What makes this study notable is that these changes were measured in the real world, during participants’ normal daily lives, rather than in a clinic. Continuous, at-home monitoring can capture patterns that a brief walking test in a doctor’s office might miss. It can also help identify potential problems years before someone is aware they exist.

The researchers also emphasize that the device used was a simple wrist-worn sensor, the kind that could be built into widely available consumer wearables, like a smartwatch. That makes this approach potentially scalable to large numbers of people. 

What Does This Mean for People with Parkinson’s?

This study does not mean that a smartwatch can diagnose Parkinson’s. The walking differences the researchers identified are subtle and show patterns across large groups — not a test that could predict whether someone will develop Parkinson’s. But these findings bring us closer to a future where observational, easy-to-record changes in the way we walk could help identify Parkinson’s years before a diagnosis. 

That possibility is significant. Growing evidence suggests that Parkinson’s leaves detectable traces years before diagnosis and traditional symptoms appear. As potential disease-slowing therapies move through clinical trials, tools that can flag people in the earliest stages could become increasingly valuable — helping researchers identify candidates for prevention studies and, eventually, helping doctors intervene sooner.

Learn More

The Parkinson’s Foundation believes in empowering the Parkinson’s community through education. Learn more about PD and movement through our resources below, or by calling our free Helpline at 1-800-4PD-INFO (1-800-473-4636) for answers to your Parkinson’s questions.

Back to Top